Skip to main content

Is securesolutions.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA Secure Solutions Reviews

securesolutions.lv favicon

Is securesolutions.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA Secure Solutions

Check if securesolutions.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPress 6.6.2jQuery 3.7.1Avia Framework 4.6AviaBuilder 0.9.5MediaElement.js+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:48:38 PM
39
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA Secure Solutions is a Latvian company specializing in the design, installation, programming, maintenance, and repair of security systems for both legal entities and private individuals. Their services include alarm systems, access control, video surveillance, notification systems, and fire safety systems, supported by recognized brands. The company targets a local market with a focus on comprehensive security solutions. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avia Framework and includes standard libraries such as jQuery and MediaElement.js. The site is mobile-optimized and has moderate performance but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly listed, which may hinder user trust and communication. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and contact transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.6.2jQuery 3.7.1Avia Framework 4.6AviaBuilder 0.9.5MediaElement.jsGoogle Maps API

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the security services sector, providing specialized security system solutions primarily in Latvia. Their business model revolves around project-based security system implementation and ongoing maintenance services. The website content suggests a small-sized enterprise with a local market focus. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies or partnerships. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies may limit customer engagement and trust. The company leverages a standard WordPress CMS platform with a custom theme, indicating moderate digital maturity. Growth opportunities exist in expanding online presence, improving compliance, and enhancing customer communication channels.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements, posing legal and reputational risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA Secure Solutions

Description:

SIA “SECURE Solutions” sertificēti speciālisti izstrādā un realizē drošības sistēmu projektus juridiskām un privātpersonām, piedāvājot sistēmu programmēšanu, uzstādīšanu, apkopi un remontu.

Key Services:
Apsardzes sistēmasPiekļuves kontroles sistēmasVideonovērošanas sistēmasApziņošanas sistēmasUgunsdrošības sistēmasDatorsistēmu piegāde, uzstādīšana, konfigurēšana, apkope un remonts
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.6.2jQuery 3.7.1Avia Framework 4.6AviaBuilder 0.9.5MediaElement.jsGoogle Maps API
Frameworks:
Avia Framework
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:37.27.130.62
Name Servers:
ns1.itt.lvDNS only
ns2.itt.lvDNS only
MX Records:
20: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
30: ASPMX3.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
20: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
30: ASPMX2.GOOGLEMAIL.COM
10: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 2025061205, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:89ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 with the Avia Framework and uses jQuery 3.7.1 along with MediaElement.js for media playback. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and WordPress core. Google Maps API is included but usage is not evident in the homepage content. The site is mobile responsive with a structured navigation menu and a fullscreen slider. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML elements present. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data detected. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Analyze Another Website