Skip to main content

Is seesaw.website a Scam? Security Check Results - seesaw.website Reviews

seesaw.website favicon

Is seesaw.website Safe? Security Analysis for SEESAW ✦ Design Inspiration

Check if seesaw.website is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Next.jsReactFathom Analytics
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 3:32:53 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.seesaw.website is a minimal Next.js and React-based site with limited content and no visible business or contact information. It uses Fathom Analytics for visitor tracking but lacks essential compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies. The absence of security headers and contact details indicates a low security posture and limited transparency. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for small or early-stage websites but reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site appears to be in an early development or placeholder state with minimal business presence.

Detected Technologies

Next.jsReactFathom Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of business descriptions, contact information, or certifications, the website does not provide sufficient data to assess market positioning, revenue streams, or target customer segments. The use of modern web technologies suggests some technical maturity, but the absence of business intelligence indicators limits competitive analysis. No partnerships or related domains were identified.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

u*****@seesaw.website

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, with no detected security headers, no visible incident response contacts, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The site uses HTTPS (assumed from modern hosting practices) but lacks explicit security best practices. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS data is noted but not justified by business type. No critical vulnerabilities were detected from the provided data, but the lack of security policies and headers is a concern.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Next.jsReactFathom Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.jsReact
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Fathom Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Fathom Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Fathom Analytics
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website uses Next.js and React framework with Fathom Analytics for tracking.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-e1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-e2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-e3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-e4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js and React, indicating a modern JavaScript framework usage. It employs Fathom Analytics for privacy-focused visitor tracking. The site preloads multiple fonts and images for performance optimization. However, the content is minimal, and no CMS or hosting provider details are evident. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO optimization is basic with limited metadata and no structured data detected. Technical debt appears low but the site lacks comprehensive content and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website