Skip to main content

Is sei.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Sei Protocol Reviews

sei.io favicon

Is sei.io Safe? Security Analysis for Sei Protocol

Check if sei.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebM videoGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:27:31 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Sei Protocol operates a cutting-edge Layer 1 EVM blockchain platform designed for high-frequency applications such as DeFi, trading, and Web3 apps. The website positions Sei as the fastest EVM blockchain with 400ms finality, 200K+ transactions per second, and ultra-low fees, supported by notable institutional backers including Coinbase and Circle. The platform targets developers and institutions seeking scalable, fast blockchain infrastructure. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, delivering excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and privacy policies are absent. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy or query failure, but the professional branding and ecosystem presence support legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebM videoGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Sei Protocol is positioned as a specialized blockchain technology provider focusing on high-frequency, scalable Layer 1 EVM blockchain solutions. Its business model revolves around providing infrastructure for decentralized finance and trading applications, targeting developers and institutional clients. The presence of leading investors and partners indicates strong market positioning and growth potential. The company emphasizes developer support through extensive documentation, tooling, and community engagement. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees and ecosystem services. The partnership ecosystem includes major crypto and trading firms, enhancing credibility and reach. Strategic observations suggest a focus on innovation and scalability to capture niche blockchain market segments.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

c*****@seifdn.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which could hinder rapid response to security issues. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking clear privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized policies. Overall, the security posture is solid but not comprehensive.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sei Protocol

Description:

Build high-frequency apps on the fastest Layer 1 EVM blockchain.

Key Services:
Layer 1 EVM blockchainHigh-frequency app supportDeFi and trading infrastructureDeveloper tools and ecosystem support
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWebM videoGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
EVM blockchain
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:216.150.1.1
Name Servers:
ns-1176.awsdns-19.orgDNS only
ns-1953.awsdns-52.co.ukDNS only
ns-357.awsdns-44.comDNS only
ns-973.awsdns-57.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a modern technology stack with Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and fast client-side interactivity. Multimedia content such as WebM videos is used effectively for engagement without compromising performance. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking, though privacy controls are limited. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Hosting provider details are not evident. The site exhibits good SEO practices with comprehensive meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Technical risks are low, but the lack of security headers and privacy controls represent areas for modernization.
Analyze Another Website