Skip to main content

Is selabs.uk a Scam? Security Check Results - SE Labs Ltd. Reviews

selabs.uk favicon

Is selabs.uk Safe? Security Analysis for SE Labs Ltd.

Check if selabs.uk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Kingdomsmall
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle Fonts (IBM Plex Mono)Font Awesome 6jQuery 3.7.1+4 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:22:45 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SE Labs Ltd. is a UK-based cyber security testing authority established in 2015, specializing in independent, intelligence-led security testing, consultancy, and training services. The company targets enterprises, security vendors, small businesses, and various professional roles such as CISOs and product managers. Their market position is that of a trusted independent testing lab providing actionable insights and rigorous evaluations to improve cyber security postures. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content and strong SEO practices. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern integrations including HubSpot for forms and analytics, Google Analytics, and Mailchimp for newsletters. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and performs moderately well. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, uses reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form protection, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response information. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adding security headers, vulnerability disclosure policies, and incident response details. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access and analysis. Strategically, SE Labs should focus on enhancing transparency around security policies and incident response, maintain rigorous third-party script audits, and consider publishing vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle Fonts (IBM Plex Mono)Font Awesome 6jQuery 3.7.1HubSpot forms and analyticsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Mailchimp newsletter integrationEmbed Any Document plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SE Labs operates in the cyber security testing sector, providing independent evaluations and consultancy services primarily to enterprises and security vendors. Their competitive advantage lies in their intelligence-led testing methodology, impartiality, and industry recognition. Revenue streams likely include testing services, consultancy fees, and training programs. The company targets a broad range of professional roles and company sizes, indicating a diversified customer base. Growth indicators include recent awards and active publication of detailed reports. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with HubSpot, Mailchimp, and Google services, supporting marketing and analytics efforts. The company maintains a clear and professional online presence, reinforcing its market position as a trusted authority in cyber security testing.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form protection, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could impact stakeholder confidence. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files, limiting transparency for security researchers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant security documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SE Labs Ltd.

Description:

SE Labs is a cyber security testing lab for enterprises and vendors, providing independent product performance and efficacy testing.

Key Services:
Cyber security product testingConsultancy and advisory servicesCyber security training (Level:Up programme)
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginGoogle Fonts (IBM Plex Mono)Font Awesome 6jQuery 3.7.1HubSpot forms and analyticsGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)Mailchimp newsletter integrationEmbed Any Document plugin
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA Enterprise on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHubSpot Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
HubSpot Analytics
Marketing Tools:
HubSpot forms and analyticsMailchimp newsletter
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

27/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:144825913.spf04.hubspotemail.net include:webmail.selabs.uk -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 87 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(673 days)
Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:147.182.141.95
Name Servers:
ns71.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns72.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: selabs-uk.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025012800, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:110ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:144825913.spf04.hubspotemail.net include:webmail.selabs.uk -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, HubSpot forms and analytics, Google Analytics, and Mailchimp integration. The site uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site employs reCAPTCHA Enterprise for bot protection on forms. Hosting appears to be managed via GoDaddy as the registrar, though specific hosting provider details are not explicit. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and rich snippets. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and publish additional security documentation to reduce technical risks.
Analyze Another Website