Skip to main content

Is selenic.com a Scam? Security Check Results - selenic consulting Reviews

S

Is selenic.com Safe? Security Analysis for selenic consulting

Check if selenic.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 8:28:41 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website 'selenic.com' presents a minimal online presence with only a logo image and a single email contact visible. There is no detailed business description, metadata, or structured data to provide insight into the company's operations or market positioning. The domain WHOIS query returned no registration data, indicating the domain may not be registered or is very recently created, which raises concerns about legitimacy. Technically, the site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and any modern web technologies or analytics, reflecting a low digital maturity level. Security posture is weak due to absence of encryption and security policies, and no compliance documentation such as privacy or cookie policies is present. Overall, the site appears to be a placeholder or very early-stage web presence with significant gaps in security, compliance, and business credibility.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of business information, metadata, or structured data, it is not possible to determine the company's market position, competitive advantages, or business model. The single email contact suggests a small or sole proprietorship consulting entity. No partnerships, certifications, or trust signals are evident. The absence of domain registration data further complicates trust and legitimacy assessments. There are no indications of revenue streams, target customer segments, or growth indicators from the website content.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

o*****@selenic.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website lacks HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security or incident response policies. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The minimal content and lack of technical controls suggest a very low security maturity level, exposing the site and its visitors to potential risks. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which limits data collection but also indicates a lack of user engagement monitoring.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

selenic consulting

Description:

No explicit business description found. The website appears to represent a consulting entity named 'selenic consulting'.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is extremely minimal with only a logo image and a single email contact.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx a ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 87 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(166 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:172.104.6.113
Name Servers:
ns.waste.org
urth.org
MX Records:
20: waste.org
SOA:Serial: 2019083101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:45ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple HTML structure with a linked CSS stylesheet and a single image for the logo. No JavaScript libraries, frameworks, or CMS platforms are detected. The site lacks meta tags, Open Graph tags, JSON-LD structured data, or any SEO optimization. No external links or social media integrations are present. The hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data. Performance and mobile optimization appear basic due to minimal content and simple layout. Accessibility features are not evident.
Analyze Another Website