Skip to main content

Is sellfox.com a Scam? Security Check Results - sellfox.com Reviews

S

Is sellfox.com Safe? Security Analysis for sellfox.com

Check if sellfox.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
JavaScriptCSSHTML
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 8:03:05 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at www.sellfox.com currently presents minimal accessible content, primarily consisting of technical scaffolding without user-facing information or metadata. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises significant concerns about the domain's legitimacy and registration status. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as Nuxt.js and loads resources from a dedicated subdomain, indicating some level of infrastructure maturity. However, the lack of security headers, privacy policies, and contact information reflects a low security posture and poor compliance with privacy standards. Overall, the site appears to be under development or inactive, limiting its trustworthiness and business credibility.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of visible business information, metadata, or contact details, it is not possible to ascertain the company's market position, business model, or target audience. The domain's unregistered or private WHOIS status further complicates trust and legitimacy assessments. No partnerships, certifications, or advertising practices are evident, suggesting minimal operational maturity or public presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is weak, with no detected HTTPS enforcement or security headers. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the minimal content limits thorough security evaluation. The domain's unknown registration status is a critical risk factor.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register and verify domain WHOIS information to establish legitimacy and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and mostly technical scaffolding with no visible user-facing content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.sf.sellfox.com -all v=spf1 include:spf.mail.az.sellfox.com -all v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarcreports@sellfox.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(879 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:1.14.235.167
Name Servers:
vip1.alidns.com
vip2.alidns.com
MX Records:
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
10: mxbiz2.qq.com
SOA:Serial: 2025073015, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.az.sellfox.com -all v=spf1 include:spf.mail.sf.sellfox.com -all v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Nuxt.js framework and loads scripts and styles from a dedicated subdomain, indicating a modern JavaScript-based SPA architecture. However, the lack of metadata, forms, and visible content suggests the site is incomplete or under construction. Performance is likely moderate given the use of modulepreload and prefetch hints, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. No CMS or third-party analytics/tracking tools were detected. Hosting appears to be custom or cloud-based on s1.sellfox.com. Technical debt is likely low but the site requires significant content and security improvements.
Analyze Another Website