Skip to main content

Is sentry.dev a Scam? Security Check Results - sentry.dev Reviews

sentry.dev favicon

Is sentry.dev Safe? Security Analysis for Sentry

Check if sentry.dev is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
JavaScript
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 10:55:59 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at sentry.dev appears to be a technology-focused platform, likely related to software development or error monitoring, as suggested by the site title 'Sentry'. However, the provided HTML content is minimal and primarily technical scaffolding without visible user-facing content or detailed business descriptions. The site uses JavaScript and internal scripts but lacks visible third-party libraries or frameworks. There is no evidence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, or terms of service in the provided snapshot. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of security headers or SSL details in the data. WHOIS data indicates privacy protection, which is typical for technology companies, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the site is accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms detected, but the limited content reduces the confidence in a full security and compliance assessment.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Based on the limited data, the business operates in the technology sector, likely providing developer tools or SaaS services related to error monitoring or application performance. The lack of visible contact information, policies, or certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The business model appears to be software-as-a-service, targeting developers or enterprises needing monitoring solutions. No partnership or subsidiary domains were identified. The minimal content and absence of marketing or analytics tools suggest a focus on core technical functionality rather than broad consumer engagement.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture assessment is constrained by the minimal HTML content and lack of security headers or SSL configuration data. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the snapshot. The absence of privacy policies and incident response contacts indicates potential compliance gaps. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is standard for tech companies and does not raise immediate concerns. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating no active security challenges on the site. Overall, the security maturity appears basic with room for improvement in transparency and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and mostly technical scaffolding with no visible user-facing content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:64.239.109.65, 64.239.123.129
Name Servers:
ns1.vercel-dns.comDNS only
ns2.vercel-dns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1655382592, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:60ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses JavaScript with deferred loading of internal scripts and stylesheets. No external libraries or CMS platforms were detected. The HTML is minimal and lacks rich metadata such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Performance is likely moderate given deferred script loading but no explicit performance optimizations or accessibility features are evident. The site appears mobile responsive at a basic level due to viewport meta tag but lacks advanced SEO or accessibility enhancements. Hosting provider and SSL details are not available from the provided data.
Analyze Another Website