Skip to main content

Is sentry.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Functional Software, Inc dba Sentry Reviews

sentry.io favicon

Is sentry.io Safe? Security Analysis for Functional Software, Inc dba Sentry

Check if sentry.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Stateslarge
ReactGatsbyGoogle Tag ManagerPlausible Analytics
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:54:18 AM
72
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Sentry, operated by Functional Software, Inc, is a mature and reputable technology company founded in 2012, specializing in application performance monitoring and error tracking software. Their platform targets developers and software teams, offering tools to identify, diagnose, and resolve software errors efficiently, thereby enhancing software quality and user experience. The company holds recognized security certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type II, underscoring their commitment to security and compliance. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging advanced web technologies and analytics for performance and user insights. Technically, the website is built using Gatsby and React frameworks, hosted on Google Cloud infrastructure, and employs Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics for tracking. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, contributing to a fast and user-friendly experience. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, comprehensive security headers, and domain transfer protections, although DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor area for improvement. From a security posture perspective, Sentry exhibits strong practices with clear incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is robust with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, including GDPR adherence. The company provides clear contact channels for security and abuse reporting, enhancing trust and transparency. Overall, Sentry presents a low-risk profile with a high level of business credibility, technical sophistication, and security maturity. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security.txt file, and enhancing transparency around data retention and DPO contact information to further strengthen compliance and trust.

Detected Technologies

ReactGatsbyGoogle Tag ManagerPlausible Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Sentry holds a strong market position as a leading SaaS provider in the application performance monitoring and error tracking sector. Their competitive advantage lies in delivering developer-centric tools that integrate seamlessly into software development workflows, enabling faster issue resolution and continuous learning. Revenue streams are primarily subscription-based, targeting software development teams across various industries. The company maintains an active partnership ecosystem and a clear brand identity, supported by certifications and transparent policies. Growth indicators include a mature domain age, consistent branding, and a comprehensive digital presence. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining security certifications and expanding compliance transparency to sustain market trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

s*****@sentry.io
a*****@sentry.io

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Sentry demonstrates a mature security posture with adherence to industry best practices, including ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certifications. The website enforces HTTPS, employs multiple security headers, and restricts domain transfers to prevent hijacking. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are publicly available, with dedicated security contact emails. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the website content. GDPR compliance is evident through detailed privacy and cookie policies. Areas for improvement include enabling DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and publishing a security.txt file to streamline vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security culture appears proactive and aligned with enterprise standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Functional Software, Inc dba Sentry

Description:

Application performance monitoring for developers & software teams to see errors clearer, solve issues faster & continue learning continuously.

Key Services:
Error trackingPerformance monitoringIssue resolutionContinuous learning
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactGatsbyGoogle Tag ManagerPlausible Analytics
Frameworks:
Gatsby
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Plausible AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Plausible Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

85/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 1016-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:sendgrid.net include:mktomail.com -all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1016-bit rsa)
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:35.186.247.156
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-d1.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d2.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.comDNS only
ns-cloud-d4.googledomains.comDNS only
MX Records:
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
50: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
50: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:230ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:mail.zendesk.com include:sendgrid.net include:mktomail.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a modern technology stack including React and Gatsby, ensuring fast rendering and excellent mobile responsiveness. Hosting on Google Cloud DNS provides reliable infrastructure, though DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. The site uses Google Tag Manager and Plausible Analytics for data collection, balancing performance and privacy. SEO and accessibility are well-implemented, contributing to good discoverability and user experience. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The technical implementation supports the business goals effectively, with opportunities to further enhance security and compliance through DNSSEC and security.txt adoption.
Analyze Another Website