Skip to main content

Is seo.com a Scam? Security Check Results - SEO.com Reviews

seo.com favicon

Is seo.com Safe? Security Analysis for SEO.com

Check if seo.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
JavaScriptMixpanelMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag ManagerMadKudu+2 more
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 11:27:26 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SEO.com is a professional SEO service provider offering a range of SEO services, tools, and resources aimed at helping businesses improve their search engine rankings. The website positions itself as an authority in the SEO industry, targeting businesses and website owners seeking to enhance their online visibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and integrates multiple modern analytics and marketing technologies such as Mixpanel, Microsoft Clarity, and MadKudu, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring secure communications. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in appearance but would benefit from improved transparency and security practices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptMixpanelMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag ManagerMadKuduMutinyYoast SEO Premium

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SEO.com operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on SEO services and digital marketing. Its business model revolves around providing SEO consulting, tools, and resources to businesses aiming to improve their search rankings. The company maintains a strong market position as an SEO authority, supported by a consistent brand presence and active social media channels. Revenue streams likely include service fees and possibly subscriptions for SEO tools. The target customer segment includes small to medium businesses and digital marketers. The lack of detailed company registration and contact information limits deeper business intelligence insights. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with major analytics and marketing platforms, enhancing service offerings.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could delay response to security incidents. The extensive use of third-party scripts increases the attack surface and requires regular auditing. Overall, while basic security measures are in place, there is room for significant improvement in compliance and security hardening.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SEO.com

Description:

Everything you need to rank your website better. Services, tools, and resources to get you higher in the search results.

Key Services:
SEO servicesSEO toolsSEO resources
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptMixpanelMicrosoft ClarityGoogle Tag ManagerMadKuduMutinyYoast SEO Premium
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
MixpanelMicrosoft Clarity
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing Ads
Tracking Pixels:
MixpanelMicrosoft ClarityLinkedIn InsightReddit PixelBing Ads Pixel
Marketing Tools:
MadKuduMutiny
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and optimized for SEO services.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:jd6yjk0x70hrfmc.spf.skiff.com include:_spf.google.com include:relay.kinstamailservice.com include:spf-0093f001.pphosted.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:easy594076@easydmarc.com
Forensic Reports:ruf@rep.easydmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 34 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:seo.com
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:9/6/2025 (34 days)
SANs:seo.com, *.seo.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2609 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:104.18.28.239, 104.18.29.239
AAAA Records:2606:4700::6812:1def, 2606:4700::6812:1cef
Name Servers:
kim.ns.cloudflare.com
walt.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: mxa-0093f001.gslb.pphosted.com
10: mxb-0093f001.gslb.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 2379437943, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:97ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:jd6yjk0x70hrfmc.spf.skiff.com include:_spf.google.com include:relay.kinstamailservice.com include:spf-0093f001.pphosted.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress and leverages a modern technology stack including JavaScript libraries and analytics tools like Mixpanel and Microsoft Clarity. It uses Yoast SEO Premium for SEO optimization, indicating a focus on search engine visibility. The site loads multiple asynchronous scripts for tracking and marketing, which may impact performance but also provide rich user behavior insights. Mobile optimization is good, and the site uses modern font loading techniques. However, the lack of detected security headers and incomplete WHOIS data suggest technical debt in security and domain management. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in script management and security configurations to enhance overall robustness.
Analyze Another Website