Skip to main content

Is seo.domains a Scam? Security Check Results - SEO.Domains Reviews

seo.domains favicon

Is seo.domains Safe? Security Analysis for SEO.Domains

Check if seo.domains is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryFlatsome themeWPML (multilingual plugin)
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:50:10 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SEO.Domains operates a specialized marketplace focused on the sale of aged and expired domains, holding approximately 70% of the global supply. Founded in 2014, the company targets SEO professionals, digital marketers, and domain investors by offering a large inventory of domains suitable for PBNs, 301 redirects, and money sites, along with backlink services. The website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and multilingual capabilities, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security policy documentation is absent. Overall, the business demonstrates strong market positioning and trust indicators, supported by multiple registrar accreditations and social media presence.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryFlatsome themeWPML (multilingual plugin)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company leverages its extensive domain portfolio as a competitive advantage, serving a niche market of SEO and domain investors globally. Its business model is primarily transactional, with additional services such as backlinks enhancing revenue streams. The presence of multiple accreditations and partnerships with registrars indicates a robust operational ecosystem. The target customer segment is well-defined, and the company maintains a professional online presence with good content quality and user experience. Growth indicators include a large client base and significant sales volume since inception.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

SEO.Domains exhibits a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, appropriate security headers, and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced documentation and proactive vulnerability management.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SEO.Domains

Description:

With 150,000+ domains, we hold ~70% of the global supply. All geos & niches, ready for PBN, 301 redirect, money site. We also offer backlinks

Key Services:
Sale of aged and expired domainsBacklink servicesDomain marketplace
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEO pluginjQueryFlatsome themeWPML (multilingual plugin)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Yoast SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and content-rich

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 48 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:140.82.53.128
Name Servers:
ns79.superhosting.bgDNS only
ns80.superhosting.bgDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2025090402, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is powered by WordPress using the Flatsome theme and Yoast SEO plugin, ensuring good SEO and multilingual support via WPML. The tech stack includes jQuery and standard web technologies. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility is basic. The site uses multiple accreditations and trust badges as part of its branding. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website