Skip to main content

Is servetraffic.com a Scam? Security Check Results - servetraffic.com Reviews

S

Is servetraffic.com Safe? Security Analysis for Performance Marketing Platform

Check if servetraffic.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSS3
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 5:03:12 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ServeTraffic.com presents itself as a performance marketing platform focused on handling large-scale event tracking and offering features such as fraud prevention, smart link campaigns, and deep analytics. The website content is minimal but clearly targets performance marketers and e-commerce businesses. The domain is registered since 2016 with a reputable registrar, indicating a stable presence. Technically, the site is basic with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected beyond the registrar's association. Security posture is moderate with no DNSSEC and no visible security headers, and privacy compliance is lacking due to absence of privacy or cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and security features.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically in performance marketing and analytics. Its business model appears to be B2B SaaS, targeting advertisers and e-commerce platforms needing fraud prevention and campaign analytics. The lack of detailed contact or policy information limits trust signals, but the domain age and registrar data support legitimacy. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The company likely operates as a small entity given the minimal web presence. Growth potential exists if the platform scales and improves customer engagement and compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Current security maturity is basic. The domain is protected against unauthorized deletion and transfer, but DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures are published. The website lacks security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a minimal informational site but requires improvements for a SaaS platform handling sensitive marketing data.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The ultimate performance marketing platform handling billions of events per day, offering features such as fraud prevention, smart link campaigns, smart alerts, deep analytics and reporting, view through attribution, and e-commerce support.

Key Services:
Fraud PreventionSmart Link CampaignsSmart AlertsDeep Analytics and ReportingView Through Attributione-Commerce Support
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3
Performance:

moderate

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is minimalistic with limited content and no visible contact or policy pages.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(64 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:35.186.253.51
Name Servers:
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.com
SOA:Serial: 2, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML and CSS with no detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS beyond the registrar association. Hosting appears to be via Google Cloud DNS services. Performance is likely moderate given minimal content and no heavy scripts. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features based on available data. SEO is basic with only a title tag and no metadata or structured data. Technical debt is low due to simplicity but modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving SEO, and enhancing accessibility. No technical risks such as exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected.
Analyze Another Website