Skip to main content

Is sgda.cc a Scam? Security Check Results - sgda.cc Reviews

S

Is sgda.cc Safe? Security Analysis for Not Found

Check if sgda.cc is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 4:55:53 AM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The domain sgda.cc currently hosts a website that is inaccessible, returning a standard HTTP 404 Not Found error page with no visible content, metadata, or business information. This lack of content prevents any meaningful analysis of the company's business model, services, or market position. The absence of privacy policies, contact information, or security headers indicates a minimal digital presence and poor website management. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which further limits the ability to verify the legitimacy or ownership of the domain. Technically, the site shows no signs of modern infrastructure or security best practices, and no WAF or blocking mechanisms are detected. Overall, the website is non-functional and does not provide any trust or credibility signals.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the complete lack of accessible content and business information on the website, no insights into market positioning, competitive advantages, or business model can be derived. The domain appears inactive or under development, with no visible revenue streams, partnerships, or customer engagement mechanisms. The privacy-protected WHOIS data and absence of contact details reduce transparency and trustworthiness, limiting any business intelligence assessment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the domain is poor due to the absence of HTTPS information, security headers, or any published security policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The privacy-protected WHOIS data is a neutral factor but combined with the lack of website content, it raises concerns about legitimacy. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators are detected, but the lack of security best practices and policies is a significant gap. The site is not currently protected by any WAF or security challenge.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a functional website with meaningful content to establish business presence and credibility.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

slow

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is inaccessible with a 404 Not Found error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 76 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Insufficient Name Servers

MEDIUM

Domain has only 1 name server (minimum 2 recommended)

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:115.29.223.210
Name Servers:
ns9.szhot.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
10: mxbiz2.qq.com
SOA:Serial: 167, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:693ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal HTML page indicating a 404 Not Found error, with no metadata, scripts, or external resources loaded. There is no evidence of a CMS, frameworks, or hosting provider details. The lack of content and technical implementation results in poor performance, no SEO optimization, and no mobile or accessibility features. The domain's technical infrastructure appears incomplete or inactive, representing a high technical risk for business operations.
Analyze Another Website