Skip to main content

Is sglr.co a Scam? Security Check Results - Bitly, Inc. Reviews

sglr.co favicon

Is sglr.co Safe? Security Analysis for Bitly, Inc.

Check if sglr.co is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesenterprise
JavaScriptSnowplow AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Consent ManagementProfitWell+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 10:45:51 PM
75
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Bitly, Inc. is a well-established technology company specializing in branded link management and URL shortening services. Founded in 2003, Bitly serves a broad business and marketing audience, offering key services such as branded links, QR codes, and analytics. The company holds a strong market position as a leading provider in its niche, trusted by major brands worldwide. The website reflects a mature digital infrastructure built on WordPress, leveraging modern analytics and consent management tools to ensure compliance and performance. Security posture is robust with HTTPS enforcement, domain registration locks, and a dedicated security center, although DNSSEC is not enabled. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, supported by a consent mechanism. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and technical maturity, with no critical vulnerabilities detected.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptSnowplow AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Consent ManagementProfitWellAWS DNSGoogle Domains DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Bitly operates a SaaS business model targeting enterprises and marketers seeking to customize and track links. Its competitive advantage lies in its brand recognition, extensive integrations, and analytics capabilities. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans and enterprise services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem and transparent legal and privacy frameworks, enhancing customer trust. Growth indicators include continuous updates, accessibility reports, and a broad resource library. Bitly's operations are primarily US-based, with a global customer reach.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity of Bitly's website is high, with enforced HTTPS, domain status locks, and a visible security center. The presence of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates compliance with data protection regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC and a published security.txt file suggests room for improvement in DNS security and vulnerability disclosure. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided, which could be enhanced to improve readiness. Overall, Bitly demonstrates a strong security culture aligned with industry best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Bitly, Inc.

Description:

Bitly provides branded link management and URL shortening services to help businesses customize, share, and track links.

Key Services:
URL ShortenerBranded LinksQR CodesAnalyticsLink Management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptSnowplow AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerOneTrust Consent ManagementProfitWellAWS DNSGoogle Domains DNS
Frameworks:
JointsWP-CSS-master (WordPress theme)
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Security Center and Trust Center pages available

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Snowplow AnalyticsGoogle Analytics (via GTM)ProfitWell
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via GTM)Snowplow AnalyticsProfitWell
Marketing Tools:
ProfitWell
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

100/100
Score
No issues found

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.com include:_spf1.mailgun.org include:_spf2.mailgun.org exists:%{i}._spf.mta.salesforce.com include:stspg-customer.com include:mail.zendesk.com a:zgateway.zuora .com -all
DNS Lookups:9/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@bitly.com
Forensic Reports:ruf@dmarc.bitly.net
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
21 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(65 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:67.199.248.14, 67.199.248.15
Name Servers:
ns-1053.awsdns-03.org
ns-1689.awsdns-19.co.uk
ns-343.awsdns-42.com
ns-880.awsdns-46.net
ns-cloud-b1.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b2.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b3.googledomains.com
ns-cloud-b4.googledomains.com
MX Records:
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:96ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_netblocks.google.com include:_netblocks2.google.com include:_netblocks3.google.com include:_spf1.mailgun.org include:_spf2.mailgun.org exists:%{i}._spf.mta.salesforce.com include:stspg-customer.com include:mail.zendesk.com a:zgateway.zuora .com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using a custom theme (JointsWP-CSS-master) and integrates multiple modern technologies including Snowplow Analytics, Google Tag Manager, ProfitWell, and OneTrust for consent management. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN with DNS managed by AWS and Google Domains. Performance is optimized with asynchronous script loading and deferred CSS. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Technical risks are minimal, though enabling DNSSEC and enhancing security headers would further strengthen the infrastructure.
Analyze Another Website