Skip to main content

Is shader.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SHADER Reviews

shader.lv favicon

Is shader.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SHADER

Check if shader.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
Bootstrap 5.0.2JavaScriptGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)SMTP.js
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:23:53 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Shader.lv is a small interior design and 3D visualization studio based in Riga, Latvia. The company offers a range of services including 3D realistic floor plans, architectural rendering, interior visualization, 3D modeling for games, and 3D animation. Their website showcases a professional portfolio with examples and partner logos, targeting clients in real estate, private homeowners, and game developers. The business model is service-oriented with a niche focus on 3D design and visualization. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap and Google Analytics, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, there is a lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies, and WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting full trust verification. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but missing security headers and policies. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap 5.0.2JavaScriptGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)SMTP.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Shader.lv operates in a competitive niche of interior design and 3D visualization services in Latvia. Their partnership with multiple local brands and presence on platforms like ArtStation and Behance indicate active engagement in the creative community. The business targets a mix of private and commercial clients, including game developers, which diversifies revenue streams. The website content and portfolio suggest a focus on quality and client engagement. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited WHOIS data transparency may impact trust with privacy-conscious clients. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and compliance improvements.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@gmail.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712052****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS usage is assumed but not explicitly confirmed. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies. The contact form collects email addresses but lacks visible privacy notices or CAPTCHA mechanisms. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and SMTP.js introduces potential risk vectors if not regularly audited. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements in policy transparency, header implementation, and vulnerability management to meet higher compliance standards such as GDPR or NIS2.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SHADER

Description:

Full service interior design firm located in Riga, BC, creating unique, inspiring & functional design solutions for private houses, public places or any other building types. Services include 3D realistic floor plans, 3D architectural rendering and visualization, 3D interior visualization, 3D modeling for games, and 3D animation.

Key Services:
3D realistic floor plans3D architectural rendering and visualization3D interior visualization3D modeling for games3D animation
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap 5.0.2JavaScriptGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)SMTP.js
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (no explicit data)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with email input and submit button

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
SMTP.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional portfolio and service site for a small interior design and 3D visualization studio.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=16070400; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.elasticemail.com a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web8.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.194.77.112
Name Servers:
ns1.garmtech.comDNS only
ns2.garmtech.comDNS only
ns3.garmtech.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.shader.lv
20: mx2.garmtech.com
SOA:Serial: 2024020660, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:274ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.elasticemail.com a:webmail.garmtech.net a:web8.garmtech.net a:ns2.garmtech.com include:relay.mailchannels.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Bootstrap 5.0.2 and standard JavaScript, with integration of Google Analytics for user tracking and SMTP.js for email functionality. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. Performance is moderate, with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO is supported by meta keywords and descriptions, though no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data was found. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the provided data. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and performance optimizations. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include adding structured data and improving security configurations.
Analyze Another Website