Skip to main content

Is shadestudio.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SHADE Reviews

shadestudio.lv favicon

Is shadestudio.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SHADE

Check if shadestudio.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaLatviasmall
jQuery 3.7.1Bootstrap 5.3.3Google Fonts
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:18:23 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SHADE is a Latvian creative agency specializing in graphic video production, visual effects, and animation services. Their website showcases a professional portfolio targeting businesses seeking high-quality media content. The company demonstrates a clear market position within the media sector, serving notable brands and focusing on delivering magical and engaging visual experiences. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies such as jQuery and Bootstrap, with good mobile optimization and a moderate performance profile. However, the site lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, and no security headers were detected, indicating room for improvement in security posture. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy assessment, but the presence of consistent contact information and professional branding supports a moderate trust level. Overall, SHADE presents as a credible small media business with a solid digital presence but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.1Bootstrap 5.3.3Google Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SHADE operates as a small creative agency in Latvia, focusing on animation, video effects, and event graphics. Their business model revolves around providing bespoke media content to corporate clients, evidenced by the display of well-known brand logos. The company targets businesses requiring creative visual solutions, positioning itself competitively in the media services market. The website's lack of advanced analytics or marketing tools suggests a focus on organic client acquisition or direct outreach. The absence of privacy and security policies may reflect a smaller operational scale or limited regulatory focus. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation. The company maintains active social media channels, supporting brand visibility and client engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@shadestudio.lv

Phone Numbers (2)

+3712834****
+3712599****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface from user input. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in case of security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, privacy compliance documentation, and incident response mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SHADE

Description:

Veidojam grafiskus video, vizuālos efektus, animāciju. Rūpējamies, lai klienta ceļš uz rezultātu būtu patīkams, bet pats rezultāts – magic!

Key Services:
AnimationVideo effectsEvent graphics
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.1Bootstrap 5.3.3Google Fonts
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (based on URL scheme https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 82 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:159.69.177.135
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1628071308, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:144ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using jQuery 3.7.1 and Bootstrap 5.3.3, leveraging Google Fonts for typography. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for viewport and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). The site is mobile optimized with responsive navigation and video content. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the HTML. Performance is moderate, with local assets and CDN usage for fonts and Bootstrap. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks advanced SEO features beyond basic meta tags. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small creative agency but could benefit from enhanced SEO, analytics, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website