Skip to main content

Is shapecity.company.site a Scam? Security Check Results - Lightspeed Commerce Inc. Reviews

L

Is shapecity.company.site Safe? Security Analysis for Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

Check if shapecity.company.site is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyCanadamedium
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:08:43 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website company.site is registered to Lightspeed Commerce Inc., a Canadian technology company founded in 2019. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate with appropriate domain security flags. However, the website itself contains only minimal HTML content with no visible business information, metadata, or interactive elements. There are no privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies present, and no contact information or forms are available. The technical infrastructure appears basic with DNS hosted on Amazon AWS DNS servers, but no advanced technologies or CMS are detected. Security posture is weak due to lack of security headers and DNSSEC not enabled. Overall, the website lacks content, SEO, and accessibility optimizations, resulting in a low trustworthiness and professionalism rating.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Lightspeed Commerce Inc. is positioned as a technology company based in Canada with a medium-sized business profile. The lack of website content limits insights into their business model, services, or market positioning. The domain age aligns with a relatively new company. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content. The absence of contact details and policies reduces transparency and customer engagement potential.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is basic with no HTTPS or SSL configuration details provided, no security headers detected, and DNSSEC not enabled. The domain status flags clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited, and clientDeleteProhibited indicate good domain registration security practices. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information are present. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security maturity is low with significant room for improvement.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Lightspeed Commerce Inc.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal with only a basic HTML skeleton and no visible content or metadata.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:7f22745d@inbox.ondmarc.com
Forensic Reports:7f22745d@inbox.ondmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 72 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(351 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:108.156.22.39, 108.156.22.27, 108.156.22.41, 108.156.22.35
Name Servers:
ns-1405.awsdns-47.org
ns-1672.awsdns-17.co.uk
ns-244.awsdns-30.com
ns-578.awsdns-08.net
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:99ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted with DNS on Amazon AWS DNS servers but lacks any detectable CMS, frameworks, or modern technologies. The HTML content is minimal with no metadata, scripts, or external links. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but are likely basic given the minimal content. No analytics or marketing tools are detected. The technical debt is high due to lack of content and security features, presenting modernization opportunities to improve user experience and security posture.
Analyze Another Website