Skip to main content

Is sherlock.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - Sherlock Protocol Reviews

sherlock.xyz favicon

Is sherlock.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Sherlock Protocol

Check if sherlock.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WebflowGSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)Swiper.jsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjar+2 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 9:32:38 PM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Sherlock Protocol is a leading blockchain security company specializing in smart contract audits, audit contests, bug bounty programs, and exploit coverage for Web3 protocols. Founded in 2020, it has established itself as a trusted partner for top blockchain projects such as Ethereum Foundation, Aave, Optimism, and MakerDAO. The company offers a comprehensive suite of security services including its Blackthorn private security firm and Sherlock Shield coverage, positioning itself as a global leader in blockchain security solutions. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP for animations and Swiper.js for interactive content. It leverages Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and well-structured with professional design and clear navigation. Analytics and tracking tools include Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight, indicating moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain protections like clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited status. However, it lacks DNSSEC, explicit security headers, and published privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page is present, limiting transparency for security incident reporting. Overall, Sherlock Protocol presents a high level of business credibility and technical maturity with strong trust signals from client testimonials and partnerships. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and some missing security best practices. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)Swiper.jsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarLinkedIn Insight TagFubi (accessibility tool)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Sherlock Protocol operates in the blockchain security sector, targeting Web3 projects and DeFi platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in combining top-ranked security researchers with innovative audit contest models and private security services (Blackthorn). The business model is service-based, generating revenue from audits, contests, bug bounties, and coverage products. The company has a strong partnership ecosystem, including Blackthorn and relationships with leading protocols. Growth indicators include a large number of critical vulnerabilities found and significant rewards paid out to researchers. The company emphasizes transparency, collaboration, and innovation in security competitions, positioning itself as a market leader with a focus on quality and trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Sherlock Protocol demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain-level protections in place. The company uses Cloudflare DNS with transfer and delete prohibitions, reducing domain hijacking risks. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No explicit incident response or security policy documentation is publicly available, which could hinder rapid response and transparency. The lack of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits external reporting channels. Overall, the security culture appears strong internally, supported by a network of top security researchers, but public-facing security documentation and controls should be enhanced to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit consent mechanisms to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Sherlock Protocol

Description:

Sherlock provides blockchain security solutions including expert audits, audit contests, bug bounties, and exploit coverage for Web3 protocols. They serve top Web3 companies and protocols with a suite of security services.

Key Services:
Blackthorn private security firmCollaborative AuditsAudit ContestsBug BountiesSherlock Shield coverage
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)Swiper.jsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarLinkedIn Insight TagFubi (accessibility tool)
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS with clientTransferProhibited and clientDeleteProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)HotjarLinkedIn Insight
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
LinkedIn Insight TagHotjar
Marketing Tools:
HotjarLinkedIn Insight
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and fully accessible.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Twitter, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

20/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:rua@dmarc.brevo.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

75/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:sherlock.xyz
Issuer:WE1
Valid Until:11/20/2025 (75 days)
SANs:sherlock.xyz

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:172.67.163.198, 104.21.15.187
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3035::6815:fbb, 2606:4700:3032::ac43:a3c6
Name Servers:
cora.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
nero.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381334285, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:102ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as GSAP for animations and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. It uses Google Fonts (Inter family) for typography and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS servers, indicating reliable hosting and CDN usage. Analytics and tracking are implemented via Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and LinkedIn Insight, providing comprehensive user behavior insights. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations, including the use of the Fubi accessibility tool. Performance appears fast with optimized images and asynchronous script loading. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and lack of explicit security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve compliance.
Analyze Another Website