Skip to main content

Is shoothouse.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Shoot House Group Reviews

shoothouse.lv favicon

Is shoothouse.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Shoot House Group

Check if shoothouse.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryAOS (Animate On Scroll)+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:13:08 PM
44
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Shoot House Group operates a shooting range in Riga, Latvia, offering recreational shooting and skill development services with professional instructors experienced in militarized structures. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting individuals interested in shooting sports locally. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, AOS animations, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is basic with HTTPS implied but lacks visible security headers and privacy policies, which impacts compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy assessment but the site content and contact information suggest a legitimate small business. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryAOS (Animate On Scroll)Google FontsGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business is positioned as a local shooting range service provider in Riga, focusing on recreational and skill-building shooting experiences. Its competitive advantage lies in professional instructors with military experience and a decade-long presence. The business model is service-oriented with direct customer engagement. The target market includes shooting enthusiasts and individuals seeking professional training. The company maintains active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram, supporting marketing efforts. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found. The business appears small in size with a focused hospitality sector niche.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712625****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, which may involve user tracking without clear consent mechanisms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, security maturity is low to moderate, with room for improvement in compliance and technical safeguards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Shoot House Group

Description:

ShootHouse.lv is a shooting range in Riga where visitors can enjoy recreational shooting or develop their shooting skills with professional instructors having over 10 years of experience in militarized structures.

Key Services:
Shooting range accessShooting skill developmentProfessional instruction
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryAOS (Animate On Scroll)Google FontsGoogle Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by og:url https://shoothouse.lv)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.243 +ip4:85.31.97.34 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.69.243
Name Servers:
ns.nano.lvDNS only
ns2.nano.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: shoothouse.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025063000, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:115ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:91.203.69.243 +ip4:85.31.97.34 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, leveraging jQuery and AOS for animations. Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and consistent branding. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No advanced frameworks or platforms were identified. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Analyze Another Website