Skip to main content

Is shopeemobile.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Shopee Reviews

shopeemobile.com favicon

Is shopeemobile.com Safe? Security Analysis for Shopee

Check if shopeemobile.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

E-commerceSingaporeenterprise
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle Tag ManagerAWS DNS
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 8:05:32 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Shopee is a leading e-commerce platform focused on Southeast Asia and Taiwan, offering a wide range of product categories and emphasizing a secure and fast shopping experience. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern tracking and analytics tools, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. However, the landing page lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as explicit contact information, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and domain protection statuses, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not evident in the provided data. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve transparency and compliance disclosures.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle Tag ManagerAWS DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Shopee holds a strong market position as a leading online shopping platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan, targeting a broad consumer audience with a marketplace business model. Its key services include online retail, payment facilitation, and logistics support. The company benefits from consistent branding and trust signals such as the Shopee Guarantee and seller ratings. The domain age and registration details support its established presence. The platform leverages partnerships with major analytics and advertising services but does not publicly disclose privacy or security policies on the landing page, which may impact user confidence and regulatory compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of DNSSEC and missing security headers represent areas for improvement. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms were found, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The extensive use of tracking technologies suggests a need for stronger privacy compliance measures. Overall, the security posture is solid but lacks transparency and some advanced protections.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies prominently linked on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Shopee

Description:

Shopee is the leading e-commerce online shopping platform in Southeast Asia and Taiwan. It provides customers with an easy, secure and fast online shopping experience through strong payment and logistical support. Shopee has a wide selection of product categories ranging from consumer electronics to home & living, health & beauty, baby & toys, fashion and fitness equipment.

Key Services:
Online shoppingPayment processingLogistical support
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelGoogle Tag ManagerAWS DNS
Frameworks:
Google Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'mail' uses 384-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(384-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@shopee.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@shopee.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:147.136.140.106
Name Servers:
ns-1209.awsdns-23.orgDNS only
ns-1728.awsdns-24.co.ukDNS only
ns-241.awsdns-30.comDNS only
ns-865.awsdns-44.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:91ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:servers.mcsv.net include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integration of Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing. Hosting is managed via Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure, indicating reliable and scalable backend support. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. No CMS or specific frameworks were explicitly detected beyond tag management tools. The site lacks visible forms on the landing page, suggesting user interactions occur on deeper pages.
Analyze Another Website