Skip to main content

Is shuiws.cc a Scam? Security Check Results - 水卫士科技 Reviews

shuiws.cc favicon

Is shuiws.cc Safe? Security Analysis for 水卫士科技

Check if shuiws.cc is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyChinasmall
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 1.7.2Font Awesome 5.15.4Line AwesomeFancybox 3+3 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 6:35:51 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

水卫士科技是一家专注于地下电缆故障检测及管线探测的专业服务公司,主要服务江苏省及周边地区的企事业单位。公司拥有先进的探测设备和经验丰富的技术团队,提供地埋电缆故障检测、地下管道定位等多项专业服务。网站内容丰富,涵盖业务介绍、案例展示及行业新闻,体现出较强的行业专业性和市场定位。技术上,网站基于WordPress平台,采用多种现代前端技术,具备良好的移动端适配和SEO优化。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,但缺少安全头部和隐私合规政策,存在一定的合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失,降低了域名透明度和信任度。整体来看,网站专业性强,内容丰富,但在隐私合规和安全策略方面有提升空间。

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 1.7.2Font Awesome 5.15.4Line AwesomeFancybox 3Owl CarouselSmush Lazy LoadInstantPage 5.1.0

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司定位为区域性地下管线探测服务提供商,目标客户为企事业单位,业务涵盖电缆故障检测和管道定位。通过丰富的案例展示和行业新闻,体现出一定的市场活跃度和客户基础。网站链接多个相关行业合作伙伴域名,显示一定的合作生态。缺乏公开的注册信息和隐私政策,可能影响部分客户的信任。业务模式为技术服务收费,规模偏小,专注于江苏及周边市场,具备一定的专业竞争优势。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (2)

189*******
051*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站启用了HTTPS,保证了数据传输安全,但未检测到安全相关HTTP头部,建议补充Content-Security-Policy、X-Frame-Options等安全头。无发现明显漏洞或敏感信息泄露,未见安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道。缺少隐私政策和Cookie政策,存在合规风险。整体安全成熟度中等,建议加强安全策略和合规建设以提升整体安全水平。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

完善网站隐私政策和Cookie政策,确保符合GDPR及相关法规要求。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

水卫士科技

Description:

水卫士科技是一家专业从事地埋电缆故障检测、地下电缆管线探测、地下金属管道探测、地下非金属管道探测的物探公司,主要为企事业单位提供电缆故障检测、管线定位探测等服务,拥有先进设备和经验丰富的工程师队伍,服务江苏省及周边地区多个城市。

Key Services:
地埋电缆故障检测地下电缆管线探测地下金属管道探测地下非金属管道探测地埋管道定位探测地埋电缆定位探测
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 1.7.2Font Awesome 5.15.4Line AwesomeFancybox 3Owl CarouselSmush Lazy LoadInstantPage 5.1.0
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

18 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:47.122.20.0
Name Servers:
dns11.hichina.comDNS only
dns12.hichina.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2025042413, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:381ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于WordPress 6.8.2,使用jQuery、Font Awesome、Owl Carousel等常见前端库,技术栈成熟但部分库版本较旧。网站结构清晰,SEO优化良好,移动端适配良好。加载性能适中,使用了图片懒加载技术。缺少安全头部和隐私合规相关技术实现。整体技术架构稳定,适合中小型企业展示和服务推广。建议关注技术更新和安全加固。
Analyze Another Website