Skip to main content

Is shuiws.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 镇江水卫士节水科技有限公司 Reviews

shuiws.com favicon

Is shuiws.com Safe? Security Analysis for 镇江水卫士节水科技有限公司

Check if shuiws.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyChinasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryLazyLoad+1 more
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 7:45:26 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

镇江水卫士节水科技有限公司是一家成立于2018年的专业节水服务企业,主要面向企事业单位和住宅小区,提供管道漏水检测、水平衡测试、雨水收集及节水改造等服务。公司在镇江地区拥有一定的市场认可度和客户基础,致力于推动节水型社会建设。网站内容丰富,展示了公司的业务范围、优势及成功案例,体现了较好的业务专业性和市场定位。技术上,网站基于WordPress平台,采用现代前端技术如LazyLoad和Seajs,具备良好的移动端适配和基本的SEO优化。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,未发现明显的安全漏洞,但缺少安全头和隐私合规政策,存在一定的合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失,可能影响域名的信任度和合法性评估。总体而言,网站专业且内容充实,但在隐私合规和安全防护方面有提升空间。

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryLazyLoadSeajs

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司定位为镇江地区专业节水服务提供商,业务涵盖管网漏水检测、节水技术改造、水平衡测试和雨水收集回用。其商业模式以技术服务和合同节水管理为核心,目标客户为企事业单位及住宅小区。公司通过政府认可和多项客户案例建立市场信誉,拥有一定的行业竞争优势。网站链接的多个地区相关域名表明其业务可能覆盖多个城市,形成区域合作网络。缺乏公开的财务和注册信息限制了对其规模和增长潜力的深入分析。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (2)

189*******
051*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站采用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,未发现敏感信息泄露或使用过时库。缺少安全相关HTTP头部(如Content-Security-Policy、X-Frame-Options等),增加了潜在的安全风险。未发现隐私政策和Cookie政策,可能导致GDPR等法规合规问题。无公开的安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道,安全管理成熟度有限。建议加强安全头配置,完善隐私合规文档,并建立安全事件响应机制以提升整体安全水平。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

增加并公开隐私政策和Cookie政策,提升合规性。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

镇江水卫士节水科技有限公司

Description:

镇江水卫士节水科技有限公司是镇江地区知名的节水服务企业。公司主要提供管道漏水检测,水平衡测试,雨水收集,节水改造等专业节水服务。

Key Services:
管道漏水检测水平衡测试雨水收集回用节水改造
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQueryLazyLoadSeajs
Frameworks:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
marketing.js
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

10 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
6 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(353 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:47.122.20.0
Name Servers:
dns21.hichina.com
dns22.hichina.com
SOA:Serial: 2025042409, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:70ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于WordPress CMS,使用现代前端技术如LazyLoad图片加载和Seajs模块管理,支持响应式设计,适配移动设备。页面结构清晰,SEO标签完善,加载性能适中。缺少安全头和隐私合规文档是技术短板。未检测到复杂的后端技术或云服务提供商信息,可能为中小型企业自托管或普通主机。整体技术架构适合当前业务需求,但存在提升空间以满足更高安全和合规标准。
Analyze Another Website