Skip to main content

Is sibisalons.versum.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Versum Software Reviews

sibisalons.versum.com favicon

Is sibisalons.versum.com Safe? Security Analysis for Versum Software

Check if sibisalons.versum.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WordPressWPBakery Page BuilderjQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager+4 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 12:09:09 AM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Versum Software offers a web-based salon management and appointment booking platform, now integrated with Booksy, targeting beauty salons and professionals. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a focus on ease of salon management and appointment scheduling. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, HubSpot, and Cookiebot, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, the site is well-designed, GDPR compliant, and positioned as a reputable SaaS provider in the salon management industry.

Detected Technologies

WordPressWPBakery Page BuilderjQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarCookiebotHubSpotCloudflare (likely for CDN and security)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Versum operates in the technology sector providing SaaS solutions for salon appointment and management. Its market positioning is strengthened by its integration with Booksy, a known brand in the salon booking space. The business model relies on subscription-based software services targeting salon owners and professionals. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics platforms to optimize customer engagement and advertising effectiveness. Social media presence across major platforms supports brand visibility and customer interaction. The lack of direct contact information on the site suggests a focus on digital self-service and online support channels. The partnership with Booksy indicates strategic alignment and potential for growth within the beauty and wellness market.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@booksy.comAmbassadorsTestimonialsKnowledge

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism indicating GDPR compliance. Multiple third-party scripts are used for analytics and marketing, which increases the attack surface and requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Security headers are partially implemented; improvements in headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are recommended. No direct evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data was found in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a risk factor that should be addressed to confirm domain ownership and legitimacy. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance trust and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Versum Software

Description:

Web-based beauty salon appointment software. Save time while managing your salon easily with Booksy (formerly Versum) - the best salon booking software!

Key Services:
Salon appointment schedulingSalon management toolsOnline booking software
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressWPBakery Page BuilderjQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerHotjarCookiebotHubSpotCloudflare (likely for CDN and security)
Frameworks:
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsHotjarHubSpot
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google DoubleClickFacebook AdsTwitter Ads
Tracking Pixels:
HotjarHubSpotFacebook PixelTwitter Pixel
Marketing Tools:
HubSpotCookiebot
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress-based site using WPBakery Page Builder

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

83/100
Score

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

Weak DKIM Key

HIGH

DKIM selector 'google' uses 480-bit key

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:email.freshdesk.com ~all v=spf1 mx a include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.emaillabs.net.pl ?all
DNS Lookups:7/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(480-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

50/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Invalid SPF Record

MEDIUM

SPF record syntax is invalid

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:35.205.71.81
Name Servers:
ns-1092.awsdns-08.orgDNS only
ns-1756.awsdns-27.co.ukDNS only
ns-260.awsdns-32.comDNS only
ns-950.awsdns-54.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:175ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx a include:_spf.google.com include:amazonses.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.emaillabs.net.pl ?all v=spf1 include:email.freshdesk.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using WPBakery Page Builder, leveraging a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, HubSpot, and Cookiebot for analytics, marketing, and compliance. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and structured data implemented via JSON-LD. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration. Technical debt appears manageable, but continuous monitoring of third-party integrations is advised to avoid security and performance issues.
Analyze Another Website