Is sick.com Safe? Security Analysis for SICK
Check if sick.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
SICK is a globally recognized enterprise specializing in the production of sensors and sensor solutions for industrial automation. Their website reflects a professional and enterprise-grade digital presence, targeting industrial clients and businesses requiring advanced automation technologies. The company positions itself as a leader in sensor intelligence with a clear focus on B2B manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks such as Angular and employs structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced SEO. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and performance characteristics. Analytics and tracking are managed via Tealium, indicating a mature approach to data collection and marketing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and asynchronous script loading, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust analysis, but the website's professional branding and content strongly suggest legitimacy. Overall, the website is well-designed and secure, with minor gaps in privacy compliance and domain registration transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing clear privacy and security policies, and verifying domain registration details for improved trust.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
SICK operates in the technology sector, focusing on industrial automation sensors. Their market position is strong as a leading global producer, serving industrial clients worldwide. The business model is B2B, providing specialized sensor products and solutions. The website content and structure indicate a large enterprise with consistent branding and professional communication. The company leverages modern digital marketing and analytics tools, suggesting a mature marketing ecosystem. No direct revenue streams or subsidiaries were identified from the content, but the brand's global presence implies a broad partnership and distribution network.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and no visible exposure of sensitive information. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which could enhance transparency and trust. The use of third-party analytics (Tealium) requires ongoing monitoring to ensure no privacy compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is solid but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
SICK
SICK is one of the world’s leading producers of sensors and sensor solutions for industrial automation applications
excellent
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- Use of async script loading
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Weak SPF Policy
HIGHSPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings