Skip to main content

Is sign.com a Scam? Security Check Results - sign.com Reviews

sign.com favicon

Is sign.com Safe? Security Analysis for Secure Signatures Online for Free

Check if sign.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
React (Next.js)Chakra UIAWS DNS hosting
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 12:52:15 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Sign.com operates as an online SaaS platform specializing in electronic signature services, enabling users to send, sign, and manage contracts and documents securely and efficiently. The website positions itself as a free, easy-to-use, and legally compliant solution, targeting individuals and businesses requiring digital signature capabilities. The platform emphasizes security features such as eIDAS compliance and end-to-end encryption, enhancing trustworthiness in the digital signature market. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks including Next.js and Chakra UI, hosted on AWS infrastructure, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. However, explicit privacy, cookie, and security policies are not publicly evident, which may impact user trust and compliance perception. The domain is longstanding, registered since 1997, indicating a mature business presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and encryption, but lacks some advanced security headers and public incident response information. Overall, the website demonstrates a professional and functional digital signature service with room for improvement in privacy transparency and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

React (Next.js)Chakra UIAWS DNS hosting

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on digital signature solutions. Its business model is SaaS-based, offering free and paid tiers to attract a broad user base. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its ease of use, legal compliance, and enhanced verification features. The target market includes small to medium businesses and individual professionals needing secure contract signing. The absence of detailed contact information and privacy policies suggests a potential area for growth in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. The domain's age and registrar information support the legitimacy of the business. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the provided data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

d*****@sign.comIf

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and mentions end-to-end encryption, indicating a baseline of secure communication. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds protection against unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no public security policy or incident response information, nor a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, limiting transparency in security management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced security controls and public disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Share and sign contracts in seconds. It’s easy to create an electronic signature that’s legal, professional, and completely secure.

Key Services:
Send documents for signatureElectronic signaturesTemplatesEnhanced verification
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
React (Next.js)Chakra UIAWS DNS hosting
Frameworks:
Next.jsChakra UI
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • End-to-end encryption mentioned
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional SaaS platform for electronic signatures

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net ip4:149.72.231.143 ip4:159.183.101.202 ~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:dmarc.rua@sign.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc.ruf@sign.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 39 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 16 days

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(0 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-1006.awsdns-61.net
ns-1033.awsdns-01.org
ns-1919.awsdns-47.co.uk
ns-433.awsdns-54.com
MX Records:
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 mx include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net ip4:149.72.231.143 ip4:159.183.101.202 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with Chakra UI for UI components, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure suggests reliable and scalable hosting. The site is mobile optimized and performs well with responsive images and preloading strategies. No CMS was detected, implying a custom or headless architecture. Accessibility is basic but present, and SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured data. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts in the provided content suggests minimal user tracking, aligning with privacy-conscious design. Technical risks are low, but improvements in security headers and privacy disclosures are recommended to reduce compliance and security risks.
Analyze Another Website