Skip to main content

Is signal-zh.org a Scam? Security Check Results - bei jing chuang xin ke ji you xian gong si Reviews

signal-zh.org favicon

Is signal-zh.org Safe? Security Analysis for bei jing chuang xin ke ji you xian gong si

Check if signal-zh.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyHong Kongsmall
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1Bulma CSS 0.8.0KaTeX 0.16.4Cloudflare DNS+2 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 2:48:59 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website signal-zh.org presents a Chinese localized version of the Signal secure messaging platform, emphasizing privacy, end-to-end encryption, and non-profit status. It offers downloads and information tailored for Chinese-speaking users, promoting Signal's core features such as encrypted messaging, calls, group chats, and stickers. The site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services, providing a professional and accessible user experience. However, the domain is recently registered by a Hong Kong-based entity that does not match the official Signal Foundation, indicating this is likely a third-party localization rather than the official site. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no exposed vulnerabilities, but lacks published security policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy for informational purposes but users should verify official sources for critical security assurances.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1Bulma CSS 0.8.0KaTeX 0.16.4Cloudflare DNSRank Math SEO pluginGPT3 AI Content Generator plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The site targets Chinese-speaking users interested in secure communications, leveraging the well-known Signal brand. Its business model is non-profit, supported by donations, and it positions itself as an independent privacy-focused messaging service. The lack of direct contact information and mismatch in registrant details suggest it operates as a regional or community-driven site rather than a corporate entity. The presence of donation links and emphasis on no ads or tracking aligns with Signal's global positioning. The site maintains a clean, professional design with clear navigation and SEO optimization, supporting user engagement and growth within its niche audience.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security practices include enforced HTTPS, no visible sensitive data leaks, and use of secure open-source protocols. However, the absence of security headers and incident response contact details limits the overall security maturity. The site does not implement cookie consent despite using Google Analytics, which may raise privacy compliance concerns. No known vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected. The WHOIS data raises some trust concerns due to registrant mismatch and recent domain age, suggesting users should exercise caution and confirm authenticity when interacting with the site or downloading software.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

bei jing chuang xin ke ji you xian gong si

Description:

Signal中文版专注于隐私和安全的即时通讯应用,Signal网页版提供端到端加密的聊天体验,Signal下载用户可以轻松安装并享受安全聊天功能,保护隐私不被泄露。

Key Services:
End-to-end encrypted messagingEncrypted voice and video callsEncrypted group chatsEncrypted stickers and media sharing
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1Bulma CSS 0.8.0KaTeX 0.16.4Cloudflare DNSRank Math SEO pluginGPT3 AI Content Generator plugin
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WindowsmacOSLinuxAndroidiOS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • No forms collecting sensitive data detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Rank Math SEOGPT3 AI Content Generator
Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 88 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
0 years(young)
Expiry Risk
low(203 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:87.120.93.40
Name Servers:
apollo.ns.cloudflare.com
asa.ns.cloudflare.com
SOA:Serial: 2379649579, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:244ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with plugins for SEO (Rank Math) and AI content generation, supported by jQuery and Bulma CSS for UI. Hosting leverages Cloudflare DNS services, enhancing availability and security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking but lacks cookie consent. No forms collecting sensitive data were detected, reducing attack surface. The technical stack is well-maintained but could benefit from additional security hardening and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website