Skip to main content

Is sigsolar.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIG SOLAR Reviews

sigsolar.lv favicon

Is sigsolar.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIG SOLAR

Check if sigsolar.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyLatviasmall
jQuery 3.0.0Google FontsFont AwesomeSwiper.jsGoogle Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:30:00 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIG SOLAR is a Latvian-based international high-tech company specializing in solar photovoltaic systems and renewable energy solutions. Founded in 2010, the company offers high-quality solar panels, water heaters, wind turbines, and lightning protection systems, with a focus on full-service installation and optimization of solar assets. Their market position is that of an experienced small enterprise with a strong local presence and a portfolio of thousands of installations. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Fonts, and Google Tag Manager, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS but lacks important security headers and visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security posture. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but the absence of WHOIS data and privacy documentation slightly reduces the trust level.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.0.0Google FontsFont AwesomeSwiper.jsGoogle Tag Manager (gtag.js)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets residential and commercial customers interested in sustainable energy solutions, leveraging direct sales and installation services. Their competitive advantage lies in direct procurement from manufacturers, eliminating intermediaries, and providing professional installation services. The business model is service and product sales with a focus on renewable energy technology. Growth indicators include a large number of installed systems and a portfolio of recent projects. The company maintains social media presence and partnerships with digital marketing agencies. However, the lack of visible certifications or compliance documentation may limit expansion into regulated markets.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@sigsolar.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712576****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which may hinder timely security issue resolution. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially exposing the company to GDPR non-compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIG SOLAR

Description:

SIG SOLAR is an international high-tech company and industrial solutions provider for solar photovoltaic systems, founded in 2010. They offer high-quality products with full service, focusing on automation and optimization of solar PV assets to make renewable energy more efficient, accessible, and profitable. Their team includes energy engineers and business administrators working to make solar energy available to everyone.

Key Services:
Solar panel installationSolar water heaters installationWind turbinesLightning protection
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.0.0Google FontsFont AwesomeSwiper.jsGoogle Tag Manager (gtag.js)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:38.114.120.79 +ip4:209.51.138.138 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:38.114.120.79
Name Servers:
dns1.globalhtcnetwork.comDNS only
dns2.globalhtcnetwork.comDNS only
MX Records:
0: sigsolar.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025070401, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:159ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:38.114.120.79 +ip4:209.51.138.138 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a standard tech stack with jQuery 3.0.0, Google Fonts, Font Awesome icons, and Swiper.js for sliders. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks advanced frameworks or platforms, indicating a straightforward custom or lightweight implementation. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of privacy compliance mechanisms.
Analyze Another Website