Skip to main content

Is siguldasbloks.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - siguldasbloks.lv Reviews

siguldasbloks.lv favicon

Is siguldasbloks.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Sākums - Siguldas Bloks

Check if siguldasbloks.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFontAwesomeRoboto fontSlick Slider
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 1:00:40 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website 'Siguldas Bloks' appears to represent a small local business, as indicated by the website title and content. The site uses standard web technologies including Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking, and FontAwesome and Roboto fonts for styling. The technical infrastructure is moderate with basic mobile optimization and no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or explicit SSL/TLS configuration details. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR or other privacy regulations. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the website is functional but lacks comprehensive business and security information, which may impact trustworthiness and user confidence.

Detected Technologies

Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFontAwesomeRoboto fontSlick Slider

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business behind the website is not clearly identified in the content or metadata. There are no visible contact details, privacy policies, or terms of service, which limits insight into the company's market position or business model. The site likely targets local customers given the Latvian language and domain. The absence of structured data and social media links suggests limited digital marketing efforts. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of visitor analysis. Without WHOIS data, the domain's registration history and ownership cannot be verified, which is a risk factor for business credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@siguldasbloks.lv

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security measures on the website are minimal. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected. The site uses HTTPS as implied by the favicon URL but SSL configuration details are unknown. No forms or input fields were found in the provided HTML, reducing immediate risk of injection attacks, but also limiting user interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Overall, the security posture is weak and should be improved to protect user data and enhance trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFontAwesomeRoboto fontSlick Slider
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:i8awixud@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:i8awixud@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 42 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:91.105.203.99
Name Servers:
ns1.colo.lvDNS only
ns2.colo.lvDNS only
MX Records:
5: ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
1: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
10: ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
5: ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 2025061301, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:287ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses common front-end technologies including FontAwesome icons, Roboto fonts, and Google Analytics for tracking. The presence of Google Tag Manager scripts indicates some marketing integration. The site appears to be custom-built or uses a lightweight CMS, as no common CMS signatures were detected. Performance is moderate with responsive design elements for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic, with some semantic HTML usage but no ARIA roles or advanced accessibility attributes detected. SEO optimization is minimal with empty meta keywords and description tags. There is opportunity to improve technical SEO, accessibility, and performance monitoring.
Analyze Another Website