Skip to main content

Is silaf.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA “SILAF” Reviews

silaf.lv favicon

Is silaf.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA “SILAF”

Check if silaf.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
Joomla CMSFont Awesome 6Swiper.jsjQuery (implied by Joomla)Speedcache (JoomUnited caching)+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:36:52 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

SIA “SILAF” is a Latvian manufacturing company specializing in the sale, purchase, restoration, and production of wooden pallets and related wooden packaging. The company serves major manufacturers in Latvia, the Baltics, and the European Union, emphasizing high quality, reliability, and environmental responsibility. Their website reflects a stable market position with clear business offerings and professional presentation. Technically, the site is built on Joomla CMS with modern frontend libraries and demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CSRF protections, though some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the transparent contact information and social media presence support legitimacy. Overall, the website is well-structured, trustworthy, and business-focused.

Detected Technologies

Joomla CMSFont Awesome 6Swiper.jsjQuery (implied by Joomla)Speedcache (JoomUnited caching)Bootstrap (popover, tooltip)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets B2B customers requiring wooden pallets and packaging solutions, including logistics and manufacturing sectors. Their business model includes sales of used and new pallets, pallet purchase for reuse, and delivery services. The company positions itself as a reliable and environmentally conscious partner with a focus on quality and fast service. The website content and social media links indicate active engagement and a stable presence in the regional market. No direct competitors or partners are listed, but the company maintains a professional digital footprint consistent with its sector.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@silaf.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712880****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS with valid SSL configuration and includes CSRF tokens in forms, indicating good baseline security practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA “SILAF”

Description:

SIA “SILAF” is a steadily growing Latvian company, proven as a reliable partner to major manufacturers in Latvia, the Baltics, and the European Union. They offer used Euro pallets (EUR, EPAL), standard, FIN, and non-standard wooden pallets, as well as other wooden packaging. They emphasize high quality and fast delivery at good prices, focusing on reputation and supplying large recognizable manufacturers with high-quality standards.

Key Services:
Used wooden pallet salesWooden pallet purchase for reuse and recyclingDelivery servicesProduction of new wooden pallets and packagingGranules and briquettes
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Joomla CMSFont Awesome 6Swiper.jsjQuery (implied by Joomla)Speedcache (JoomUnited caching)Bootstrap (popover, tooltip)
Frameworks:
Joomla
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible and professionally designed.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

60/100
Score

Weak X-Frame-Options configuration

LOW

Current value: "SAMEORIGIN, SAMEORIGIN"

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "strict-origin-when-cross-origin, unsafe-url"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: LinkedIn, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:81.94.233.3 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 59 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:81.94.233.3
Name Servers:
ns1.server2.megasoft.lvDNS only
ns2.server2.megasoft.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: mail.silaf.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025063005, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:223ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:81.94.233.3 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on Joomla CMS with integration of Font Awesome 6 and Swiper.js for UI components. It uses Speedcache for caching and performance optimization. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Accessibility is basic but functional. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small manufacturing business website, with no obvious technical debt or risks visible from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website