Skip to main content

Is silo.finance a Scam? Security Check Results - SiloDAO Reviews

silo.finance favicon

Is silo.finance Safe? Security Analysis for SiloDAO

Check if silo.finance is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/amedium
WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryWebFont LoaderThe Graph API+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 2:09:50 AM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Silo Finance operates as a non-custodial decentralized finance (DeFi) platform specializing in high-yield, risk-isolated money markets for lending and borrowing crypto assets across Ethereum and EVM-compatible chains. The platform offers a suite of services including lending, borrowing, liquidity management via Silo Vaults, developer tools for building custom lending infrastructure, and token staking/governance through the SILO/xSILO token evolution. Positioned as an innovative player in the DeFi space, Silo emphasizes risk isolation and cross-chain interoperability to attract crypto lenders, borrowers, and developers. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS with modern web technologies including Google Fonts, jQuery, and integration with The Graph API and Chainlink CCIP for blockchain data and cross-chain token transfers. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site features rich multimedia content, clear navigation, and comprehensive developer and user documentation, reflecting a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, Silo Finance demonstrates strong commitment through multiple third-party audits, formal verification of its codebase, a substantial bug bounty program, and live event monitoring. However, some improvements are recommended such as adding explicit security headers, publishing a security.txt file, and implementing cookie consent mechanisms to enhance GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, Silo Finance presents a trustworthy and professional DeFi platform with a solid security posture and a well-executed web presence. The lack of WHOIS transparency is typical for crypto projects and does not detract significantly from legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, improving security header implementation, and providing clearer incident response contacts to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryWebFont LoaderThe Graph APIChainlink CCIP

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Silo Finance is positioned as a specialized DeFi lending and borrowing protocol focusing on risk-isolated money markets, targeting crypto asset holders and developers seeking customizable lending infrastructure. Its business model revolves around non-custodial finance, earning revenue through lending interest, borrowing fees, liquidity incentives, and governance token utility. The platform's competitive advantages include risk isolation, cross-chain interoperability, and a developer-friendly hooks stack for custom deployments. Partnerships with security audit firms and analytics platforms enhance credibility. Growth indicators include active governance, multiple chain deployments, and a substantial bug bounty program. The ecosystem is supported by integrations with Chainlink, The Graph, and community engagement via Discord, Telegram, and Github.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Silo Finance exhibits a mature security posture with multiple comprehensive audits from reputable firms (Certora, Sigmap Prime, Spearbit Cantina, Enigma), formal verification, and a $350,000 bug bounty program hosted on Immunefi. The platform also participates in live event monitoring and has signed the Security Alliance’s Safe Harbor Agreement, indicating commitment to security best practices. However, the website lacks explicit security headers and a published security.txt file, which are recommended for improved vulnerability disclosure and mitigation. No direct incident response emails are publicly listed, which could be enhanced to improve responsiveness. Overall, the security culture appears strong but could benefit from formalizing some web security practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SiloDAO

Description:

High-Yield, Risk-Isolated Money Markets for Lending & Borrowing Any Crypto Asset

Key Services:
LendingBorrowingLiquidity management via Silo VaultsDeveloper tools for building lending infrastructureToken staking and governance
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle FontsjQueryWebFont LoaderThe Graph APIChainlink CCIP
Platforms:
EthereumSonicAvalancheArbitrum
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Multiple third-party audits
  • Formal verification of codebase
  • Bug bounty program with $350,000 reward
  • Live event monitoring and tracing

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com ~all.
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Subdomain Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:siros@silo.finance

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 89 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:198.202.211.1
Name Servers:
ns-1175.awsdns-18.orgDNS only
ns-1551.awsdns-01.co.ukDNS only
ns-840.awsdns-41.netDNS only
ns-91.awsdns-11.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com ~all.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website leverages a modern technology stack centered on Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, and jQuery, with integration of blockchain data via The Graph API and cross-chain token transfer support through Chainlink CCIP. Hosting is via AWS Cloudfront CDN, providing reliable content delivery. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site uses rich multimedia content including background videos and interactive elements. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by updating security headers and improving privacy compliance mechanisms.
Analyze Another Website