Skip to main content

Is silverswap.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Mercurialis Reviews

silverswap.io favicon

Is silverswap.io Safe? Security Analysis for Mercurialis

Check if silverswap.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyFrancesmall
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWeb3 integrationsCloudflare DNS and registrar
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:57:03 PM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SilverSwap is a recently launched decentralized exchange platform operating on the Sonic blockchain, offering fast token swaps, liquidity provision, farming, bridging, governance, leverage trading, lending, and staking services. The platform targets DeFi users and crypto traders seeking efficient and innovative trading solutions on Sonic network. Technically, the website is built with modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted via Cloudflare, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized and provides a professional user experience with good SEO practices. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration transparent, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy and contact information are not published, which reduces compliance and trust. Overall, SilverSwap presents a credible and functional DeFi platform with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWeb3 integrationsCloudflare DNS and registrar

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

SilverSwap positions itself as a premium DEX on the Sonic blockchain, leveraging proprietary AMM technology and offering a broad suite of DeFi services including token swaps, liquidity farming, bridging, governance via insilver token, and upcoming leverage trading features. The business model relies on swap fees, farming rewards, and governance incentives. The company Mercurialis, based in France, is the domain registrant and likely the operator. The platform has established partnerships with community and analytics platforms such as Discord, GitHub, CoinGecko, and DefiLlama. The target market includes active DeFi participants and Sonic network users. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active social media presence. Strategic observations suggest focusing on enhancing security policies and privacy compliance to build greater user trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

SilverSwap demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain registration transparency. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates potential vulnerabilities. No published security or incident response policies reduce preparedness visibility. The lack of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files limits responsible vulnerability reporting. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Mercurialis

Description:

SilverSwap is a decentralized exchange (DEX) operating on the Sonic blockchain network, offering industry-leading swap speeds and a proprietary AMM architecture combining uniV4 AMM with a stable swap. The platform provides services including token swapping, liquidity provision, farming, bridging tokens from other chains, insilver governance token benefits, leverage trading (Ape Mode), lending and borrowing, dollar-cost averaging (DCA), and staking.

Key Services:
Token swappingLiquidity provision and farmingToken bridgingGovernance via insilver tokenLeverage trading (Ape Mode)Lending and borrowingDollar-cost averaging (DCA)Staking
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptWeb3 integrationsCloudflare DNS and registrar
Frameworks:
Next.js
Platforms:
Sonic blockchainCloudflare hosting/DNS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a decentralized exchange platform on Sonic blockchain

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(593 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
nena.ns.cloudflare.com
nitin.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2381271002, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:127ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, providing a responsive and performant user experience. Hosting and DNS are managed by Cloudflare, ensuring reliable delivery and security features. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, indicating moderate user data collection. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. However, the absence of CMS suggests custom development. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading. Accessibility is basic but functional. Technical debt appears low, but security improvements are needed to reduce risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but should evolve to incorporate stronger security and privacy controls.
Analyze Another Website