Is simpleicons.org Safe? Security Analysis for Simple Icons
Check if simpleicons.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Simple Icons is an open source project founded in 2013 that provides a comprehensive library of 3354 SVG icons representing popular brands. It serves developers, designers, and digital content creators who require consistent and scalable brand icons for their projects. The project is community-driven, hosted on GitHub, and supported by donations via Open Collective, positioning it as a trusted resource in the design and development ecosystem. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including JavaScript and WebAssembly for performance, and is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. The site is well optimized for mobile devices, loads quickly, and offers a clean user experience with clear navigation and search capabilities. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no advanced security headers are detected, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and has domain transfer protections enabled. The domain is privacy protected, which is common for open source projects, and the domain age aligns with the project's history, supporting legitimacy. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms is a compliance gap. Overall, Simple Icons presents a low-risk profile with a strong reputation in its niche. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and adding security headers to enhance protection. These steps will improve compliance posture and user trust while maintaining the project's open source ethos.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Simple Icons occupies a niche in the technology sector as a provider of free, open source SVG brand icons. Its business model is community-supported, relying on contributions and donations rather than direct revenue. The project targets developers and designers globally, offering a valuable resource that integrates into various platforms and tools. Its partnerships include GitHub for code hosting and Open Collective for funding. The project demonstrates steady growth and active maintenance, with a broad ecosystem of third-party extensions and integrations enhancing its reach and utility.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The security posture of Simple Icons is moderate to good. The site enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, reducing risks of domain hijacking. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options limits its defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy pages are published, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability management. The absence of privacy and cookie consent mechanisms also poses compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but would benefit from enhanced security controls and documented policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Simple Icons
Provides 3354 SVG icons for popular brands
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is an open source project providing free SVG icons for popular brands.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Weak Referrer-Policy configuration
LOWCurrent value: "same-origin"
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Facebook
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 44 days
Weak SSL Key Length
HIGHSSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Good Network Security Posture
LOWNo unnecessary services detected on common risky ports
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings