Skip to main content

Is simplify.com a Scam? Security Check Results - simplify.com Reviews

S

Is simplify.com Safe? Security Analysis for Platform Decommission Notice

Check if simplify.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:06:05 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website simplify.com currently serves only a platform decommission notice indicating that the platform was decommissioned on July 15th, 2025. There is no active content, no privacy or cookie policies, no contact information, and no visible business or security documentation. The domain is long-established, created in 1994, and registered with a reputable registrar, CSC Corporate Domains, Inc., but the lack of DNSSEC and minimal website content suggest the platform is no longer operational. Technically, the site is minimal with no detectable scripts, frameworks, or CMS, and hosted behind Akamai nameservers. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers, SSL details, and policies. Overall, the site is inactive and provides no business or security value at this time.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the decommissioned status and minimal content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a previously established entity, but no current business model, services, or market positioning is evident. No contact or partnership information is available to assess ecosystem or growth indicators.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is poor with no evidence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, or incident response contacts. No vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer information is present. The lack of DNSSEC and security policies further weakens trust. No scripts or forms reduce attack surface but also indicate no active security management. Overall, the site is not secure for active business use.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

If the platform is to be relaunched, implement HTTPS with valid SSL certificates immediately.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website is a decommission notice page indicating the platform was decommissioned on July 15th, 2025.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and only shows a platform decommission notice.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:deliverygateways.mastercard.com include:deliverygateways2.mastercard.com ip4:209.64.210.30 ip4:216.119.210.197 ip4:12.10.32.85 ip4:209.64.210.32 ip4:216.119.210.208 ip4:12.22.158.17 ip4:12.22.158.18 ip4:12.14.114.40 ip4:57.67.177.44 ip4:216.119.213.10 ip4:57.67.177.45 ip4:89.101.143.34 ip4:216.119.214.193 ip4:216.119.215.193 ip4:34.223.36.100 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_rua@emaildefense.proofpoint.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc_ruf@emaildefense.proofpoint.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.simplify.com
Issuer:DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1
Valid Until:4/13/2026 (219 days)
SANs:*.simplify.com, simplify.com

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:216.119.218.37
AAAA Records:2607:3c00:6414:5::fffc
Name Servers:
a1-29.akam.netDNS only
a18-64.akam.netDNS only
a22-65.akam.netDNS only
a26-66.akam.netDNS only
a7-67.akam.netDNS only
a9-64.akam.netDNS only
MX Records:
10: mxb-00078002.gslb.pphosted.com
10: mxa-00078002.gslb.pphosted.com
SOA:Serial: 684, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:56ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:deliverygateways.mastercard.com include:deliverygateways2.mastercard.com ip4:209.64.210.30 ip4:216.119.210.197 ip4:12.10.32.85 ip4:209.64.210.32 ip4:216.119.210.208 ip4:12.22.158.17 ip4:12.22.158.18 ip4:12.14.114.40 ip4:57.67.177.44 ip4:216.119.213.10 ip4:57.67.177.45 ip4:89.101.143.34 ip4:216.119.214.193 ip4:216.119.215.193 ip4:34.223.36.100 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is a static minimal HTML page with no metadata, no scripts, no external links, and no forms. Hosting appears to be via Akamai CDN based on nameservers. No CMS or frameworks detected. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic due to lack of content and structure. SEO is poor with no meta tags or structured data. The domain is old but the website is inactive, indicating technical debt or retirement.
Analyze Another Website