Skip to main content

Is siriuss.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Siriuss Reviews

S

Is siriuss.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Siriuss

Check if siriuss.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailLatviasmall
jQuery 2.2.4BootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:18:00 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Siriuss.lv is a Latvian small business specializing in the production and online retail of natural confectionery products such as marmalade, jelly candies, jams, pastila, and vegan cheese. The company emphasizes traditional recipes and natural ingredients, targeting local consumers who value artisanal sweets. The website is built on the RapidWeaver CMS platform using the Foundry theme, incorporating modern web technologies like jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and provides clear navigation and contact information, supporting a positive user experience. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of visible security headers indicate areas for compliance and security improvement. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy image for a small local business.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.4BootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the retail and e-commerce sectors, focusing on niche artisanal confectionery products made in Latvia. Its business model revolves around direct online sales through an integrated shop, supported by clear contact channels and product categorization. The company appears to have a stable market position within its local niche, leveraging traditional recipes and natural ingredients as competitive advantages. The presence of multiple language options (Latvian, Russian, English) suggests an intent to reach a broader regional audience. The company does not display certifications or extensive trust badges but maintains a consistent brand presence. The lack of WHOIS transparency slightly impacts trust but is mitigated by clear contact details and professional site design.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@siriuss.lv

Phone Numbers (3)

+3712960****
003*******
296*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics for tracking but lacks advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No forms with sensitive input fields were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. The absence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates non-compliance with GDPR best practices, which could pose regulatory risks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is moderate, suitable for a small business but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Siriuss

Description:

Latvijā ražoti saldumi, izmantojot senas receptes un dabīgus produktus. Internetveikals. Vērtīgi saldumi no dabīgām izejvielām - marmelāde, želejas konfektes, ievārījums, pastila, ķīselis.

Key Services:
Production and sale of marmaladeJelly candiesJelly piecesJam (ievārījums)PastilaKisselThickenersCoconut oilVegan cheeseOnline shop
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.2.4BootstrapFont AwesomeGoogle Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks:
Foundry theme for RapidWeaver
Platforms:
RapidWeaver CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small Latvian confectionery business with an online shop.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mboxhosting.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 58 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:185.176.40.231
Name Servers:
ns5.awardspace.comDNS only
ns6.awardspace.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.siriuss.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025030101, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:286ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.mboxhosting.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on RapidWeaver CMS with the Foundry theme, using jQuery 2.2.4 and Bootstrap for responsive design. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site loads a consolidated CSS file and uses Font Awesome for icons. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly set, including Open Graph tags for social sharing. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated vulnerable libraries visibly. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Analyze Another Website