Skip to main content

Is siriustoken.io a Scam? Security Check Results - siriustoken.io Reviews

siriustoken.io favicon

Is siriustoken.io Safe? Security Analysis for Sirius: A Liquidity Pair Token on Tezos

Check if siriustoken.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptSwiper.jsGoogle Fonts
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:07:08 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Siriustoken.io operates as a niche decentralized finance (DeFi) platform offering a liquidity pool token called Sirius ($SIRS) on the Tezos blockchain. The token simplifies participation in Liquidity Baking, allowing users to earn rewards by purchasing the token instead of performing complex multi-step transactions. The website targets cryptocurrency investors and Tezos users interested in liquidity pool participation. The business model revolves around token issuance and DeFi liquidity provision, positioning itself as a specialized player within the Tezos ecosystem. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and the Swiper.js library for interactive content. Hosting appears to be on Amazon AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS servers. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic accessibility and SEO features. However, no CMS or advanced frameworks are detected, indicating a relatively simple but functional technical setup. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and DNSSEC is not enabled, which are areas for improvement. The domain uses privacy protection for WHOIS data, common in crypto projects, but no contact or incident response information is provided. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating low privacy compliance. The overall security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing standard security best practices and transparency measures. Overall, the website is professional and relevant to its niche but lacks critical compliance and security documentation. Strategic recommendations include adding privacy and cookie policies, enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptSwiper.jsGoogle Fonts

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Sirius token targets a specialized market segment within the Tezos blockchain ecosystem, focusing on liquidity baking participation. Its competitive advantage lies in simplifying the user experience for liquidity providers by tokenizing the participation process. Revenue streams likely derive from token sales and liquidity incentives. The target customers are crypto investors and DeFi participants on Tezos. The project is relatively new, founded in 2022, and operates independently without visible parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership ecosystem is minimal with no explicit partners listed. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of public business information. The website content and branding are consistent, supporting a focused market presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity level is basic. Key vulnerabilities include absence of DNSSEC, lack of security headers, and no published security or incident response policies. The domain uses privacy protection which is justified but reduces transparency. There are no visible compliance indicators for GDPR or other regulations. Data protection practices are unclear due to missing privacy documentation. Incident response readiness cannot be assessed. The security culture appears minimal based on available information. Business impact of these gaps includes potential trust issues and exposure to DNS spoofing or web-based attacks. Enhancing security posture is critical for credibility in the crypto space.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Sirius ($SIRS) is a token that enables automatic participation in Liquidity Baking, a decentralized liquidity pool between tez and tzBTC on the Tezos blockchain. It simplifies the process of earning liquidity baking rewards by allowing users to purchase Sirius tokens instead of conducting multi-step transactions.

Key Services:
Liquidity pool token issuanceSimplified liquidity baking participationReward earning via tez token distribution
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptSwiper.jsGoogle Fonts
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain uses clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited status to prevent unauthorized transfers and updates

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(530 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:52.85.49.111, 52.85.49.66, 52.85.49.50, 52.85.49.96
Name Servers:
ns-1142.awsdns-14.org
ns-1586.awsdns-06.co.uk
ns-402.awsdns-50.com
ns-597.awsdns-10.net
MX Records:
10: alt1.gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
20: alt2.gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
30: alt3.gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
40: alt4.gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
5: gmr-smtp-in.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:60ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using standard web technologies with a focus on simplicity and user experience. It uses Swiper.js for interactive sliders and Google Fonts for typography. Hosting is likely on AWS infrastructure, providing reliable performance. The site is mobile optimized and has a clean design. However, there is no CMS detected, which may limit content management flexibility. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. The absence of advanced frameworks or analytics tools suggests a lightweight but basic technical implementation. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers which could impact site integrity and user trust.
Analyze Another Website