Skip to main content

Is sitebrunch.com a Scam? Security Check Results - sitebrunch.com Reviews

sitebrunch.com favicon

Is sitebrunch.com Safe? Security Analysis for sitebrunch – Dein Website Hub

Check if sitebrunch.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerVarify.ioFramer
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:24:44 PM
61
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

sitebrunch.com is a newly established technology company (founded in 2024) offering an integrated web analytics and accessibility toolset. Their platform combines accessibility checks, web tracking, live heatmaps, user flow analysis, comments, and campaign tracking into a single solution targeting website owners and marketers. The website is built using the Framer platform and hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, indicating a modern technical foundation. The use of Google Tag Manager and Varify.io scripts suggests a focus on analytics and site verification. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is currently weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. No contact or business registration information is publicly available on the site, which may impact trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good user experience but requires improvements in privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerVarify.ioFramer

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in the technology sector with a SaaS business model focused on web analytics and accessibility tools. The target market includes website owners and digital marketers seeking comprehensive tracking and accessibility solutions. The company appears to be a small startup with no publicly disclosed parent or subsidiary relationships. The integrated feature set may provide competitive advantages by consolidating multiple analytics functions into one platform. The lack of explicit trust signals such as certifications or customer testimonials suggests early-stage market presence. The domain registration and hosting on AWS are consistent with a legitimate new business. Strategic partnerships or expanded marketing efforts could enhance market positioning.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and use of reputable third-party services for analytics and verification. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents missed opportunities to harden security. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance gaps, including missing privacy and cookie policies, pose regulatory risks under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Accessibility Checks, Web Tracking, Live Heatmaps, User Flows, Comments & Kampagnen Tacking in einem Tool.

Key Services:
Accessibility ChecksWeb TrackingLive HeatmapsUser FlowsCommentsCampaign Tracking
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerVarify.ioFramer
Frameworks:
Framer
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google Tag Manager
  • Use of Varify.io for site verification

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerVarify.io
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Varify.io
Marketing Tools:
Varify.io
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is newly launched (2024) and uses modern web technologies.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

70/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:144556027.spf01.hubspotemail.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 67 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(140 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:35.71.142.77, 52.223.52.2
Name Servers:
ns-1515.awsdns-61.org
ns-1921.awsdns-48.co.uk
ns-328.awsdns-41.com
ns-631.awsdns-14.net
MX Records:
0: sitebrunch-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:67ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:144556027.spf01.hubspotemail.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts and JavaScript libraries. Hosting is provided by Amazon AWS, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The site loads multiple asynchronous scripts including Google Tag Manager and Varify.io for analytics and site verification. The HTML is well-structured with appropriate meta tags for SEO and social media sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). Mobile optimization appears good with responsive viewport settings. Accessibility features are basic but present. Performance is moderate given the number of external resources. No forms or user input fields were detected in the provided content, reducing attack surface. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and functional but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website