Skip to main content

Is sitejs.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Small Technology Foundation Reviews

S

Is sitejs.org Safe? Security Analysis for Small Technology Foundation

Check if sitejs.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyIrelandsmall
Node.jsExpress.jsDotJSHugoJavaScript+3 more
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 11:11:46 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Site.js is an open-source web construction set developed and maintained by the Small Technology Foundation, a non-profit organization based in Ireland. The platform targets individual users and small-scale developers, providing tools to develop, test, sync, and deploy static and dynamic websites easily. It integrates modern technologies such as Node.js, Express.js, Hugo static site generator, and DotJS for dynamic routing, with automatic TLS provisioning via Let’s Encrypt and mkcert. The project emphasizes simplicity, security by default, and freedom, catering to the 'Small Web' community rather than enterprises or governments. Technically, Site.js demonstrates a mature and modern infrastructure with support for multiple platforms (Linux, macOS, Windows), integrated static site generation, dynamic JavaScript routing, WebSocket support, and a built-in JavaScript database (JSDB). The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive documentation and examples, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. From a security perspective, Site.js benefits from automatic TLS everywhere, secure WebSocket implementations, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the website lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data is malformed and lacks transparency, but the website's open-source nature and non-profit affiliation support its legitimacy. Overall, Site.js presents a low-risk profile with strong technical and business credibility, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security policy disclosures to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

Node.jsExpress.jsDotJSHugoJavaScriptWebSocketsLet’s Encryptmkcert

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Site.js occupies a niche market focused on empowering individuals and small developers to host and manage their own websites with ease and security. Its competitive advantage lies in its all-in-one binary tool that simplifies deployment and management, automatic TLS provisioning, and integration with popular static and dynamic site technologies. The business model is donation-funded open source, targeting a community valuing privacy, simplicity, and control. The foundation's non-profit status and transparent open-source code foster trust and community engagement. Partnerships with Owncast and integration with Hugo expand its ecosystem. Growth indicators include active GitHub repositories and recent content updates. Strategic observations highlight a focus on decentralization and user empowerment rather than commercial enterprise solutions.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Site.js demonstrates a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced by default using Let’s Encrypt and mkcert, secure WebSocket support, and no detected vulnerabilities in the provided content. The platform's design encourages secure defaults and ease of use, reducing common misconfigurations. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published privacy and security policies represent compliance gaps. Incident response mechanisms and vulnerability disclosure policies are not evident on the site, which could be improved to enhance security readiness. The WHOIS data's lack of transparency is a minor concern but mitigated by the open-source and non-profit nature of the project. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized policies and disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Small Technology Foundation

Description:

Site.js is a small web construction set designed for individuals to develop, test, sync, and deploy websites and web applications easily. It supports static and dynamic sites, automatic TLS, and includes features like WebSockets and a built-in JavaScript database. The project is maintained by the Small Technology Foundation, a tiny not-for-profit based in Ireland focused on tools for individuals rather than enterprises or governments.

Key Services:
Static and dynamic site hostingAutomatic TLS provisioningIntegrated Hugo static site generatorDotJS dynamic routingWebSocket supportJavaScript in-memory database (JSDB)Proxy server with automatic TLS
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Node.jsExpress.jsDotJSHugoJavaScriptWebSocketsLet’s Encryptmkcert
Frameworks:
Express.jsHugo static site generator
Platforms:
LinuxmacOSWindows
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • Automatic TLS everywhere
  • Secure WebSocket support
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts
  • Secure dynamic routing with DotJS
  • Automatic certificate renewal

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
archive.org internal analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "no-referrer-when-downgrade"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:207.241.224.6/32 ip4:207.241.224.2/32 a:bromkins.net include:spf.braintreegateway.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:_spf.google.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:noc@archive.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

82/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
29 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1923 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:207.241.224.2
Name Servers:
ns-global.kjsl.com
ns0036.secondary.cloudflare.com
ns0208.secondary.cloudflare.com
ns1.archive.org
ns2.archive.org
ns3.archive.org
MX Records:
100: mail.archive.org
SOA:Serial: 2025090502, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:30ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:207.241.224.6/32 ip4:207.241.224.2/32 a:bromkins.net include:spf.braintreegateway.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:_spf.google.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern and robust technical stack including Node.js, Express.js, Hugo, and DotJS, supporting both static and dynamic content efficiently. The integration of automatic TLS provisioning and WebSocket support indicates a well-architected infrastructure prioritizing security and performance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured content. The use of a single binary tool simplifies deployment and reduces technical debt. Performance appears fast with minimal external dependencies beyond essential libraries and archive.org resources. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and formalize privacy and security policies to reduce compliance risks.
Analyze Another Website