Skip to main content

Is sixflower.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 六朵花 Reviews

Is sixflower.com Safe? Security Analysis for 六朵花

Check if sixflower.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

RetailChinamedium
JavaScriptCSSHTML
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 12:12:15 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

六朵花是一家专注于中国市场的鲜花电商平台,提供网上订花、鲜花速递及送花上门服务,覆盖多个主要城市。网站内容丰富,涵盖多种鲜花产品分类和节日专题,满足不同客户需求。技术上,网站采用基础的HTML、CSS和JavaScript,支持移动端访问但优化较为基础。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS,但缺少关键安全头,且未发现隐私或cookie政策,存在合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失,影响域名可信度。总体风险中等,建议加强安全和合规措施以提升信任度。

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

六朵花定位为专业鲜花速递服务商,业务模式为电子商务,主要收入来自鲜花销售和配送服务。其覆盖广泛的城市网络和多样化产品线是其竞争优势。目标客户为中国大陆个人及企业用户,尤其注重节日和特殊场合的鲜花需求。网站通过400电话和在线客服提供客户支持,显示一定的客户服务能力。缺乏公开的隐私和安全政策可能影响用户信任和合规性。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

S*****@163.com

Phone Numbers (1)

400*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站安全成熟度中等,使用HTTPS保障数据传输安全,但缺少内容安全策略(CSP)、HTTP严格传输安全(HSTS)等安全头,增加潜在风险。未发现安全事件响应或漏洞披露政策,缺乏安全文化和合规指引。WHOIS信息缺失是一个显著的安全和信任隐患,建议尽快核实域名注册状态。整体安全建议包括完善安全头配置、发布隐私及安全政策、加强域名管理。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

部署和配置关键安全HTTP头,如Content-Security-Policy和HSTS,提升防护能力。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

六朵花

Description:

六朵花是专门提供网上订花送花和鲜花速递服务的花店,多年来专注于网上花店的送花服务,深知每一束鲜花都蕴含着客户的重要心意,以感恩之心设计每款鲜花,将爱与情感传递。

Key Services:
网上订花鲜花速递送花上门服务多城市配送
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML
Platforms:
DesktopMobile
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
在线客服系统 (tb.53kf.com)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
16 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(479 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:60.247.225.16
Name Servers:
ns11.xincache.com
ns12.xincache.com
MX Records:
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
10: mxbiz2.qq.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站采用传统的HTML和JavaScript技术,未检测到现代框架或CMS。页面结构清晰,SEO基础良好,包含丰富的meta标签和JSON-LD结构化数据。性能表现中等,移动端支持存在但优化空间较大。缺少安全头和现代安全机制,存在技术债务。建议引入现代前端框架和安全最佳实践,提升性能和安全性。
Analyze Another Website