Skip to main content

Is skana.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Skana.lv Reviews

S

Is skana.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Skana.lv

Check if skana.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
JavaScriptjQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerYouTube embed
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:09:24 PM
40
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Skana.lv is a Latvian small business specializing in professional event technical services including sound, lighting, video equipment rental, and stage construction with TÜV safety certification. Operating since 2004, it targets event organizers and performers primarily in Riga and Latvia. The website is well structured, visually consistent, and provides clear service descriptions and contact information. Technically, it uses common web technologies such as JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, and YouTube embeds, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with IP anonymization in analytics but lacks security headers and privacy policies, indicating compliance gaps. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerYouTube embed

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company holds a stable market position as a local event technical service provider with over 20 years of experience. Its business model focuses on equipment rental and technical support for events, weddings, and live music. The website reflects a direct-to-customer approach with no visible e-commerce but clear contact channels. The absence of social media links suggests a focus on direct client relationships. The TÜV certification adds credibility and safety assurance. Growth potential exists in expanding digital presence and compliance maturity.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@skana.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712618****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and anonymizes IP addresses in Google Analytics, which are positive security practices. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user interaction. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard web security best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to address GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Skana.lv

Description:

Professional event sound and lighting services including technical event realization and production since 2004. Offers sound, lighting, video equipment rental and stage constructions with TÜV safety certification.

Key Services:
Sound equipment delivery, installation and operationLighting equipment delivery, installation and operationVideo equipment rental and installationStage platform and construction rental with TÜV certificationTechnical consulting and event production
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQueryGoogle AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerYouTube embed
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 21 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.203.70.160
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
30: aspmx4.googlemail.com
30: aspmx5.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1748023062, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:150ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a standard tech stack with JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, and YouTube embeds. It loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses CSS bundles for styling. The site is moderately performant with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. The site could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced accessibility compliance. The lack of structured data (JSON-LD) limits SEO potential. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website