Skip to main content

Is skip.build a Scam? Security Check Results - Skip Reviews

skip.build favicon

Is skip.build Safe? Security Analysis for Skip

Check if skip.build is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
Vue.jsNuxt.jsJavaScriptSVG graphics
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 9:23:37 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Skip is a technology company focused on building tools for sovereign communities, primarily in the blockchain and cross-chain interoperability space. Their key offerings include the Skip:Go API for seamless cross-chain application connectivity, the Skip:Go Widget for easy user onboarding, and Skip:Connect, a native oracle system for real-time data streaming. The company positions itself as a critical infrastructure provider for the emerging sovereign web, targeting developers and blockchain builders. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure using Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, with responsive design and good performance. However, the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide direct contact information, which are areas for improvement. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but missing security headers and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms reduce the overall security maturity. Overall, Skip presents as a credible and professional technology startup with strong partnerships and a clear market focus.

Detected Technologies

Vue.jsNuxt.jsJavaScriptSVG graphics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Skip operates in the blockchain infrastructure sector, offering APIs and widgets that enable cross-chain interoperability and data streaming. Their business model revolves around providing developer tools and infrastructure services to sovereign communities and blockchain ecosystems. The presence of partner logos such as dydx, Neutron, Celestia, and others indicates a strong partnership ecosystem and market positioning. The company targets developers and builders in the blockchain space, aiming to simplify complex multi-domain interactions. Growth indicators include active developer documentation, job listings, and social media presence. The lack of detailed business registration or physical address information suggests a startup or early-stage company. Strategic observations include the need to enhance compliance and security transparency to build further trust.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie policy, or vulnerability disclosure page, indicating gaps in compliance and incident response readiness. No contact channels for security incidents were found. The absence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries is positive, but the lack of security best practices documentation and contact information reduces the overall security posture. The site does not appear to use tracking or analytics scripts that could raise privacy concerns. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and header implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Skip

Description:

Skip builds tools for sovereign communities, providing infrastructure for cross-chain control flow and multi-domain interactions. Their offerings include Skip:Go API for cross-chain application connectivity, Skip:Go Widget for easy onboarding, and Skip:Connect, a native oracle system for real-time on-chain and off-chain data streaming.

Key Services:
Skip:Go APISkip:Go WidgetSkip:Connect oracle system
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Vue.jsNuxt.jsJavaScriptSVG graphics
Frameworks:
Nuxt.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(292 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns-1348.awsdns-40.org
ns-1796.awsdns-32.co.uk
ns-484.awsdns-60.com
ns-517.awsdns-00.net
MX Records:
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:109ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:mg-spf.greenhouse.io ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Vue.js and Nuxt.js, indicating a contemporary and maintainable tech stack. The use of SVG graphics and responsive design demonstrates attention to visual quality and mobile optimization. Preloading of scripts and fonts suggests performance optimization efforts. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site loads quickly and is well-structured, but lacks advanced SEO metadata beyond basic Open Graph and Twitter card tags. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected in the provided HTML. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking scripts, which may be intentional for privacy reasons. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO and accessibility improvements.
Analyze Another Website