Skip to main content

Is skozolnieki.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Skrējēju klubs "Ozolnieki" Reviews

skozolnieki.lv favicon

Is skozolnieki.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Skrējēju klubs "Ozolnieki"

Check if skozolnieki.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressJetpack pluginGoogle Fonts (Cabin, Chivo)VideoPressSwiper.js+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:31:06 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Skrējēju klubs "Ozolnieki" is a local running club based in Latvia with a long tradition dating back to 1979. The website serves as a community hub for organizing running events, training sessions, and sharing news related to the club's activities. The site is hosted on WordPress.com and uses Jetpack plugins and Google Fonts, indicating a modern but basic digital infrastructure. The content is primarily in Latvian and targets local runners and sports enthusiasts. The club appears to be a small, community-focused organization without commercial business operations. Technically, the website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly provided, which may limit direct communication. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe, with no signs of malicious content or adult material.

Detected Technologies

WordPressJetpack pluginGoogle Fonts (Cabin, Chivo)VideoPressSwiper.jsGravatar hovercards

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The club operates in the sports and community sector, focusing on running events and training in the Jelgava/Ozolnieki region of Latvia. It leverages WordPress.com for hosting and event registration partnerships with sportlat.lv. The business model is likely non-profit or community-driven, relying on event participation and local engagement. The website content and event announcements demonstrate active community involvement and a stable presence since 1979. There is no evidence of commercial revenue streams or subsidiaries. The club's market position is local and niche, with a loyal audience of runners and sports enthusiasts. The partnership with sportlat.lv for event registration indicates integration with regional sports infrastructure.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from WordPress.com's managed hosting environment, providing HTTPS and basic security protections. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates a compliance gap, especially under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which limits the ability to report or respond to security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better policy disclosures and security header implementation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Skrējēju klubs "Ozolnieki"

Description:

Skrējēju klubs "Ozolnieki" is a running club with traditions since 1979, organizing running events and training sessions primarily in Ozolnieki, Latvia.

Key Services:
Running events organizationTraining sessionsCommunity engagement in running sports
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressJetpack pluginGoogle Fonts (Cabin, Chivo)VideoPressSwiper.jsGravatar hovercards
Platforms:
WordPress.com hosting
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of WordPress.com managed hosting security

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
wordpress.com pixel.wp.com
Marketing Tools:
JetpackWordPress.com subscription and follow widgets
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress.com hosted blog for a local running club in Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 47 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.78.24, 192.0.78.25
Name Servers:
ns1.wordpress.comDNS only
ns2.wordpress.comDNS only
ns3.wordpress.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2005071858, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:188ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a standard WordPress.com hosting platform with Jetpack plugins, Google Fonts, and VideoPress for media. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate, typical for WordPress.com hosted sites. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site does not use advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated libraries. The infrastructure is suitable for a small community sports club but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance measures.
Analyze Another Website