Skip to main content

Is sl-fp.ch a Scam? Security Check Results - Stiftung Landschaftsschutz Schweiz Reviews

sl-fp.ch favicon

Is sl-fp.ch Safe? Security Analysis for Stiftung Landschaftsschutz Schweiz

https://sl-fp.ch

Check if sl-fp.ch is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitSwitzerlandsmall
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsFlickity CarouselLess CSS
Analyzed 10/4/2025Completed 3:31:43 AM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Stiftung Landschaftsschutz Schweiz (SL-FP) is a well-established Swiss non-profit foundation dedicated to the protection, preservation, and enhancement of natural and cultural landscapes in Switzerland. Founded in 1970, it operates across all governmental levels and engages with partners and the public to promote sustainable landscape management. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence, offering comprehensive information about its mission, projects, and landscape awards. Technically, the site uses a custom CMS (fuman), modern JavaScript libraries, and Google Analytics with IP anonymization, indicating moderate digital maturity. Security posture is good with HTTPS and some security best practices, though improvements in security headers and privacy compliance (cookie consent) are recommended. Overall, the site is trustworthy, accessible, and serves its target audience effectively.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsFlickity CarouselLess CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The foundation holds a strong market position within the Swiss environmental non-profit sector, leveraging partnerships with recognized organizations and maintaining a clear focus on landscape protection. Its business model centers on project work, advocacy, and public engagement, supported by donations and memberships. The presence of ZEWO certification enhances donor trust. The website's multilingual support and clear navigation facilitate outreach to diverse Swiss populations. Growth potential lies in expanding digital engagement and enhancing compliance with evolving privacy regulations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@sl-fp.ch

Phone Numbers (1)

+4131377****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a solid security baseline with enforced HTTPS and anonymized analytics tracking. However, the absence of explicit Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options headers presents moderate risks such as clickjacking and content injection. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from targeted enhancements to align with best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Stiftung Landschaftsschutz Schweiz

Description:

Die Stiftung Landschaftsschutz Schweiz (SL-FP) ist eine gemeinnützige Stiftung, die sich für den Schutz, die Pflege und Aufwertung der schützenswerten Natur- und Kulturlandschaften in der Schweiz engagiert. Sie agiert auf allen Staatsebenen und fördert einen Ausgleich zwischen Mensch und Natur mit einem starken Fokus auf Nachhaltigkeit.

Key Services:
Projektarbeit im LandschaftsschutzÖffentlichkeitsarbeit und InformationsbereitstellungAuszeichnung Landschaft des JahresFörderung nachhaltiger LandbewirtschaftungBeratung und Stellungnahmen zu Landschaftsthemen
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AnalyticsFlickity CarouselLess CSS
Frameworks:
fuman CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 45 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:80.74.154.3
Name Servers:
ns0.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns1.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns2.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns3.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
ns4.dnsmadeeasy.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: slfp-ch0e.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2008010254, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:49ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the fuman CMS platform, utilizing JavaScript libraries such as Flickity for carousels and Google Analytics for user tracking. The use of Less CSS indicates a modern styling approach. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and clear navigation structures. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with enhanced ARIA roles and labels. Hosting details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports the foundation's communication goals effectively with room for modernization and security hardening.
⭐ Verified Community Reviews

What others say about sl-fp.ch

Share your experience to help others make informed decisions. We verify every review by email and publish it once our moderation team approves it.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

out of 5

0 reviews published

Loading reviews…

How did we do?

Your feedback directly shapes our roadmap. Rate the quality of this report, leave an optional comment, and let us know if you want our security specialists to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.

Analyze Another Website