Skip to main content

Is sling.com a Scam? Security Check Results - sling.com Reviews

S

Is sling.com Safe? Security Analysis for Error Page

Check if sling.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 7:00:46 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at sling.com is currently inaccessible due to a 403 Forbidden error page, indicating that access is blocked by a security mechanism such as a Web Application Firewall (WAF). As a result, no business content, metadata, or contact information is available for analysis. The domain itself is well-established, registered since 1999 with CSC Corporate Domains, Inc., and shows no signs of privacy protection or suspicious registration patterns, suggesting legitimacy. However, the lack of accessible content severely limits the ability to assess the company's business model, services, or technical infrastructure. Security posture cannot be evaluated beyond the presence of blocking mechanisms. Overall, the site appears to be protected by security controls that prevent external analysis.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the blocked content, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the website. The domain age and registrar indicate a mature and legitimate entity, but no information about market positioning, services, or partnerships is available. The absence of public policies or contact details reduces transparency and trust signals.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The presence of a 403 Forbidden error with a support ID suggests active security controls such as a WAF are in place, which is a positive security indicator. However, no further security headers, SSL configuration details, or vulnerability disclosures are available for review. The lack of accessible content and policies limits assessment of compliance with GDPR or incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Ensure legitimate users and analysts can access at least public-facing content to improve transparency and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

The website returned an HTTP 403 Forbidden error with a message indicating the URL was rejected and a support ID, typical of a WAF or security blocking mechanism.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to a 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a:mailin.dish.com ip4:66.170.243.4 ip4:67.21.131.90 ip4:67.21.132.90 ip4:67.21.131.85 ip4:67.21.132.85 include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:_spf.google.com include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:3e3d6bc3da52011@rep.dmarcanalyzer.com
Forensic Reports:3e3d6bc3da52011@for.dmarcanalyzer.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Expires Soon

HIGH

Domain expires in 5 days

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
26 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
high(4 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:159.60.130.57
Name Servers:
ns-1160.awsdns-17.org
ns-1600.awsdns-08.co.uk
ns-321.awsdns-40.com
ns-674.awsdns-20.net
MX Records:
10: us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com
10: us-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:193ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a:mailin.dish.com ip4:66.170.243.4 ip4:67.21.131.90 ip4:67.21.132.90 ip4:67.21.131.85 ip4:67.21.132.85 include:spf.mandrillapp.com include:_spf.google.com include:us._netblocks.mimecast.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on infrastructure using Amazon AWS DNS services, indicating a reliable hosting environment. However, no HTML metadata, scripts, or CMS information is available due to the blocked content. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be assessed. The domain registration is consistent and secure with transfer prohibitions enabled. The technical setup appears standard but inaccessible for detailed evaluation.
Analyze Another Website