Skip to main content

Is sma.de a Scam? Security Check Results - SMA Solar Technology AG Reviews

sma.de favicon

Is sma.de Safe? Security Analysis for SMA Solar Technology AG

Check if sma.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyGermanyenterprise
AngularMaterial Design ComponentsCSSHTML5
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:15:00 PM
73
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

SMA Solar Technology AG operates a professional website focused on photovoltaic inverter solutions and solar energy technology. The company is positioned as a leading enterprise in the energy sector, targeting solar energy professionals and customers. The website uses modern web technologies such as Angular and Material Design, hosted on professional DNS infrastructure. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, and security headers, which are important for compliance and security posture. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, the site is professional but could improve its security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

AngularMaterial Design ComponentsCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets the renewable energy market with a focus on photovoltaic inverters and solar solutions. Its business model centers on manufacturing and selling these products globally. The website branding is consistent and professional, reflecting an enterprise-level organization. The absence of detailed contact information and compliance policies on the site suggests room for improvement in customer engagement and regulatory transparency. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture with no detected security headers and no visible SSL/TLS configuration details in the provided data. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response information, indicates gaps in compliance and security readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site should implement standard security headers, enforce HTTPS, and provide clear privacy and incident response information to improve its security maturity.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SMA Solar Technology AG

Description:

SMA Solar Technology AG is a company specializing in photovoltaic solutions and inverters, providing products and services for solar energy systems.

Key Services:
Photovoltaic invertersSolar energy solutionsTechnical support and services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
AngularMaterial Design ComponentsCSSHTML5
Frameworks:
Angular
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professional and focused on solar energy solutions.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

90/100
Score

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:52.137.61.15 ip4:20.123.164.91 ip4:62.157.91.9 ip4:76.14.140.26 ip4:62.157.182.115 ip4:54.240.4.4 ip4:194.176.121.23 ip4:82.135.58.65 ip4:82.135.58.28 ip4:185.38.116.10 ip4:185.38.116.11 include:_spf.salesforce.com include:mailing.eqs.com inclu de:spf.protection.outlook.com include:successfactors.eu include:spf.sma-de.cloud.nospamproxy.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

100/100
Score

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:*.sma.de
Issuer:Amazon RSA 2048 M02
Valid Until:7/28/2026 (362 days)
SANs:*.sma.de, sma.de

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:18.66.122.55, 18.66.122.4, 18.66.122.78, 18.66.122.120
AAAA Records:2600:9000:2250:fa00:10:ed0:2880:93a1, 2600:9000:2250:4000:10:ed0:2880:93a1, 2600:9000:2250:ec00:10:ed0:2880:93a1, 2600:9000:2250:c200:10:ed0:2880:93a1, 2600:9000:2250:6c00:10:ed0:2880:93a1, 2600:9000:2250:c000:10:ed0:2880:93a1, 2600:9000:2250:2c00:10:ed0:2880:93a1, 2600:9000:2250:f400:10:ed0:2880:93a1
Name Servers:
ns1.eurodns.com
ns2.eurodns.com
ns3.eurodns.com
ns4.eurodns.com
MX Records:
10: sma-de.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025072800, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:65ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:52.137.61.15 ip4:20.123.164.91 ip4:62.157.91.9 ip4:76.14.140.26 ip4:62.157.182.115 ip4:54.240.4.4 ip4:194.176.121.23 ip4:82.135.58.65 ip4:82.135.58.28 ip4:185.38.116.10 ip4:185.38.116.11 include:_spf.salesforce.com include:mailing.eqs.com inclu de:spf.protection.outlook.com include:successfactors.eu include:spf.sma-de.cloud.nospamproxy.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Angular framework with Material Design components, indicating a modern front-end technology stack. Hosting appears to be managed via EuroDNS nameservers, suggesting professional DNS management. The site shows good mobile optimization and a consistent design language. However, no CMS or backend technologies were identified from the provided data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low but security and compliance features need enhancement.
Analyze Another Website