Skip to main content

Is sma.energy a Scam? Security Check Results - sma.energy Reviews

S

Is sma.energy Safe? Security Analysis for 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Check if sma.energy is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyN/amedium
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:32:43 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain sma.energy is registered since 2015 under EuroDNS S.A. registrar and appears to represent a business in the energy sector. However, the website is currently inaccessible, returning a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable error with no content or metadata available for analysis. This lack of accessible content prevents any meaningful assessment of the company's services, market position, or digital presence. The technical infrastructure details are minimal, with no evidence of HTTPS, security headers, or modern web technologies. The security posture is weak due to the absence of visible security best practices and policies. Overall, the site is currently non-functional, which poses a significant risk to business credibility and user trust.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the unavailability of website content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests an established presence since 2015, likely in the energy sector. No information on business model, partnerships, or customer segments is available. The lack of accessible content and contact information severely limits insights into the company's operations or market positioning.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is currently poor. The domain does not have DNSSEC enabled, and no security headers or HTTPS status are provided. The site returns a 503 error, indicating downtime or maintenance, but no WAF-specific challenge was detected. No privacy, cookie, or incident response policies are published, indicating compliance gaps. The absence of contact channels for security incidents further reduces readiness. Overall, the site lacks fundamental security and compliance features.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Restore website availability to provide accessible content and services.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable error with minimal HTML content, indicating the site is currently down or blocked. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently inaccessible, returning a 503 error with no content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

0/100
Score
Analysis failed - content could not be retrieved

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(237 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:18.195.104.87, 3.75.158.182, 18.184.251.48
Name Servers:
ns1.eurodns.com
ns2.eurodns.com
ns3.eurodns.com
ns4.eurodns.com
MX Records:
10: sma-energy.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2024091200, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:86ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website currently serves only a minimal 503 error page with no metadata, scripts, or content. The hosting provider is EuroDNS S.A., but no CMS or frameworks are detected. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt and security risks. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. Restoration of the website and implementation of modern web standards are necessary to improve technical maturity.
Analyze Another Website