Is small-tech.org Safe? Security Analysis for Small Technology Foundation
Check if small-tech.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Small Technology Foundation is a small, independent two-person non-profit organization based in Ireland focused on developing the Small Web — a privacy-respecting, user-controlled alternative to Big Tech dominated web platforms. Their core activities include research and development of open source software projects, advocacy, and education. The website reflects a clear mission with well-structured content and a strong emphasis on privacy and open source principles. Technically, the site uses modern web standards with good mobile optimization and accessibility, though no CMS or major frameworks are detected. Security posture is moderate with domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No forms or tracking scripts reduce attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, though improvements in security headers and cookie consent would enhance compliance and security.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The foundation occupies a niche market segment focused on privacy-first web technologies and small-scale digital tools. Their business model is non-commercial, relying on patronage and donations. Their open source projects hosted on Codeberg and published educational materials position them as thought leaders in the small web and privacy space. The target audience includes privacy-conscious users, developers, and advocates. The organization’s small size and independent status limit scale but enhance authenticity and trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. The foundation’s consistent branding and clear mission support a strong market position within their niche.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer lock status, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security represent missed opportunities to harden security. No incident response or security policy is published, which could hinder response to security events. No forms or user data collection reduce exposure to common web vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and transparency around security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Small Technology Foundation
A tiny and independent two-person not-for-profit based in Ireland working on building the Small Web, focusing on small technology tools designed to increase human welfare rather than corporate profits.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
fast
good
good
good
Security Assessment
- Domain status clientTransferProhibited
- No exposed sensitive data in HTML
- No forms collecting sensitive data on homepage
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a small non-profit focused on privacy and small web technologies.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration
LOWCurrent value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains"
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 43 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
Weak SPF Policy
HIGHSPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings