Skip to main content

Is small-web.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Registrant of small-web.org Reviews

R

Is small-web.org Safe? Security Analysis for Registrant of small-web.org

Check if small-web.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherUnited Kingdomsmall
HTML5CSS3
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:16:43 PM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website 'small-web.org' serves as a minimal informational placeholder focused on the concept of the 'Small Web'. It provides a single external link to an article explaining the concept but lacks substantive business content, contact information, or user engagement features. The domain is registered with a reputable registrar and shows no suspicious registration patterns, indicating legitimacy but minimal operational maturity. Technically, the site is very basic, built with simple HTML and CSS, hosted on DNSimple's infrastructure. There are no advanced frameworks, CMS, or analytics tools detected. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance is expected to be fast due to minimal content. From a security perspective, the site lacks security headers and does not enable DNSSEC, which could be improved. There is no privacy or cookie policy, and no contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and compliance. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected, but the security posture is minimal. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile due to its minimal content and lack of data collection but scores low on business credibility, privacy compliance, and content quality. Strategic improvements in security, compliance, and content richness are recommended to enhance trust and user engagement.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets a general audience interested in the concept of the Small Web, likely enthusiasts or researchers. It does not appear to operate a commercial business model or offer services. The domain age and registration details suggest a small-scale project or informational site without significant market positioning or revenue streams. There are no partnerships or subsidiaries indicated. The lack of contact information and policies limits business transparency and credibility.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security maturity is low. The absence of security headers, DNSSEC, and privacy policies indicates limited security and compliance focus. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The domain status clientTransferProhibited is a positive control against unauthorized transfers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were found, but the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and compliance documentation.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC and implement standard security headers to improve domain and site security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Registrant of small-web.org

Description:

The website appears to be a minimal placeholder or informational page about the concept of the 'Small Web', linking to an external article explaining the concept.

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is a minimal placeholder with very limited content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

95/100
Score

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Certificate Details

Subject:small-web.org
Issuer:R11
Valid Until:11/5/2025 (60 days)
SANs:small-web.org

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(325 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:135.181.44.50
AAAA Records:2a01:4f9:c010:a943::1
Name Servers:
ns1.dnsimple.com
ns2.dnsimple.com
ns3.dnsimple.com
ns4.dnsimple.com
SOA:Serial: 1597159249, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:101ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with basic HTML5 and CSS3 without any detected JavaScript frameworks or CMS. Hosting is via DNSimple nameservers, indicating a likely static site setup. The site is minimal and fast loading but lacks meta tags beyond viewport and charset, limiting SEO effectiveness. Accessibility features are minimal but present via semantic HTML. There is no evidence of technical debt but also no advanced technical infrastructure or modernization. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Analyze Another Website