Skip to main content

Is smiedriba.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Biedrība Šmiedrība Reviews

smiedriba.lv favicon

Is smiedriba.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Biedrība Šmiedrība

Check if smiedriba.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherLatviasmall
WordPressElementorjQuery
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:29:54 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Biedrība Šmiedrība is a Latvian non-profit organization operating locally from Ventspils. The website provides basic information about the organization including official registration number, physical address, and banking details. The organization maintains a presence on Facebook and LinkedIn, indicating some level of community engagement. The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, reflecting a standard CMS platform for small organizations. The technical infrastructure is modern but basic, with no advanced analytics or tracking scripts detected. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website is functional and consistent with a small non-profit entity but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorjQuery

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization targets local community members or stakeholders in Ventspils, Latvia. Its business model is that of a non-profit association, likely focused on community or cultural activities. The website does not list specific services or programs but provides essential contact and banking information. The presence on social media platforms suggests efforts to engage with a broader audience. The lack of detailed business or service descriptions limits deeper market positioning analysis. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The organization appears to maintain a modest digital footprint appropriate for its size and sector.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

b*****@smiedriba.lv

Physical Addresses (1)

Company Registration

Legal Name:

Biedrība Šmiedrība

Registration Number:

40008304107

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing attack surface. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies or incident response contacts. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits insight into user behavior. Overall, the security posture is basic and could benefit from enhancements in headers, policies, and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Biedrība Šmiedrība

Description:

Biedrība Šmiedrība is a Latvian non-profit organization registered with registration number 40008304107. It operates from Ostas iela 15, Ventspils, Latvia. The organization appears to be community or association based, with banking details provided for AS Swedbank.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorjQuery
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a WordPress site using Elementor builder.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:89.111.20.183 ~all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1416-bit rsa)

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 50 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:89.111.20.185
Name Servers:
cloudns.hostnet.lvDNS only
cloudns2.hostnet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
0: smiedriba.lv
SOA:Serial: 2023092806, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:195ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:89.111.20.183 ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder plugin, a common and modern platform for small to medium websites. It loads multiple CSS and JS assets including jQuery and Swiper for frontend functionality. The site is served over HTTPS with valid SSL certificates. Performance appears moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with standard meta tags but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags beyond basic feed links. No third-party analytics or advertising scripts were found, indicating a low tracking footprint. Hosting provider details are not explicitly disclosed in the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website