Skip to main content

Is snazzymaps.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Snazzy Maps Reviews

snazzymaps.com favicon

Is snazzymaps.com Safe? Security Analysis for Snazzy Maps

Check if snazzymaps.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
jQuery 2.2.3Google Fonts (Open Sans, Source Sans Pro)Google AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseHandlebars.js (templating)+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 1:03:48 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Snazzy Maps is a niche technology website founded in 2013 that provides a free repository of Google Maps styles aimed at web designers and developers. The platform offers style exploration, creation tools, map building features, and plugins, monetized primarily through advertising. The website demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality with a clear target audience. Technically, it uses a modern but simple tech stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Azure CDN for asset delivery. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks important security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Contact information is limited to a support email, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business profile, indicating legitimacy and stability.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.2.3Google Fonts (Open Sans, Source Sans Pro)Google AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseHandlebars.js (templating)Custom JavaScript and CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website occupies a specialized market segment providing free Google Maps styling resources, appealing to web developers and designers. Its business model relies on user-generated content and advertising revenue, with no direct sales or subscription services evident. The site maintains a small but focused presence with social media engagement on Twitter and Facebook. The lack of detailed company information or physical address suggests a small-scale operation. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its curated style repository and easy-to-use tools. Growth potential may be tied to expanding style offerings and enhancing user engagement. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@snazzymaps.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and the domain status clientTransferProhibited adds protection against unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and responsiveness to security issues. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Analytics and Adsense, which introduce tracking and potential privacy concerns. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Snazzy Maps

Description:

Snazzy Maps is a repository of different styles for Google Maps aimed towards web designers and developers. All styles are licensed under creative commons and are completely free to use.

Key Services:
Repository of Google Maps stylesStyle creation editorMap building toolPlugins
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.2.3Google Fonts (Open Sans, Source Sans Pro)Google AnalyticsGoogle AdsenseHandlebars.js (templating)Custom JavaScript and CSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=3600"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1134 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:23.99.91.55
Name Servers:
dns1.registrar-servers.com
dns2.registrar-servers.com
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1747084477, TTL: 3601s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:400ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a straightforward technology stack with jQuery 2.2.3, Google Fonts, and Google Analytics for tracking. Assets are served via Azure CDN, which supports performance and scalability. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and SEO meta tags. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The presence of multiple Google Adsense ad placements indicates monetization through advertising. No CMS or major frameworks are detected, suggesting a custom-built or lightweight platform. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected but potential for optimization exists. The lack of modern security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt and security risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small-scale content site but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website