Skip to main content

Is snitcher.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Snitcher Reviews

snitcher.com favicon

Is snitcher.com Safe? Security Analysis for Snitcher

Check if snitcher.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
WebflowGoogle Tag ManagerMixpanelStatsigUsercentrics+5 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 8:35:18 AM
63
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Snitcher is a B2B SaaS company specializing in website visitor identification and lead generation solutions. Their platform enables businesses to identify, enrich, and engage with anonymous website visitors in real time, turning passive traffic into actionable leads. The company positions itself as a leading provider in the visitor identification market, targeting revenue teams and marketers. The website showcases strong branding, customer testimonials, and a high G2 rating, indicating market trust and customer satisfaction. Technically, the website is built on Webflow and integrates multiple modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, and Segment Analytics, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages and the lack of WHOIS domain registration data introduce some trust concerns. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and consent management tools but lacks visible security headers and formal security policies, suggesting room for improvement in security posture. Overall, the website is professional and user-friendly but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation to improve compliance and trust.

Detected Technologies

WebflowGoogle Tag ManagerMixpanelStatsigUsercentricsSegment AnalyticsTypekit FontsReddit PixelLinkedIn Insight TagSnitcher Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Snitcher operates in the technology sector, providing essential tools for B2B lead generation and visitor identification. Their business model is SaaS-based, focusing on real-time data enrichment and workflow automation for sales and marketing teams. The company leverages partnerships and integrations with major analytics platforms to enhance its offering. The presence of notable customers and a strong G2 rating indicates a solid market position and growth potential. However, the domain's WHOIS inconsistency suggests the need for verification of business legitimacy. The company targets medium-sized businesses and revenue teams seeking to optimize website traffic conversion. Strategic partnerships and a comprehensive feature set position Snitcher competitively in the marketing technology landscape.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and the use of a consent management platform (Usercentrics) indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service pages, absence of security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information highlight compliance gaps. The extensive use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration ambiguity further impact trustworthiness. To enhance security posture, Snitcher should implement comprehensive security policies, publish contact channels for incident response, and adopt security best practices such as CSP and HSTS headers.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies prominently on the website.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Snitcher

Description:

Identify, enrich, and engage with visitors the moment they show interest—no more guessing who’s browsing. Turn passive website traffic into hot leads.

Key Services:
Visitor identificationLead generationContact revealWorkflow triggersGoogle Analytics enrichmentIP-company API
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WebflowGoogle Tag ManagerMixpanelStatsigUsercentricsSegment AnalyticsTypekit FontsReddit PixelLinkedIn Insight TagSnitcher Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • Consent management via Usercentrics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (GA4 Enricher)Google Tag ManagerMixpanelSegment AnalyticsStatsig
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Reddit PixelLinkedIn Insight TagMixpanelStatsigSegment Analytics
Marketing Tools:
MixpanelSegment AnalyticsUsercentrics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

70/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

22/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net -all
DNS Lookups:2/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 30 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(955 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:99.83.190.102, 75.2.70.75
Name Servers:
abby.ns.cloudflare.com
max.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2382486387, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:50ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Webflow CMS and integrates a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Segment Analytics, Statsig, and Usercentrics for analytics and consent management. The site loads multiple external scripts asynchronously to optimize performance. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and Open Graph data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Performance is moderate with potential optimization opportunities in script loading and caching. The absence of hosting provider data limits infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional user experience but requires enhancements in security and compliance features.
Analyze Another Website