Skip to main content

Is snohetta.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Snøhetta Reviews

snohetta.com favicon

Is snohetta.com Safe? Security Analysis for Snøhetta

Check if snohetta.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateN/amedium
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Video embeddingLazy loading images
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 12:19:19 AM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Snøhetta is a globally recognized transdisciplinary design and architecture practice, offering a broad range of services including architecture, landscape, interior, product design, and brand experience. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence with excellent design quality, mobile optimization, and rich multimedia content showcasing their projects and news. The technical infrastructure is robust, leveraging modern web technologies and a content management system (Craft CMS), with fast loading times and good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is limited, lacking clear privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Business credibility is high based on content quality and branding, but the absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could enhance transparency and compliance aspects.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML5Video embeddingLazy loading images

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Snøhetta operates in the real estate and design sectors, targeting clients seeking innovative architectural and design solutions worldwide. Their business model centers on providing multidisciplinary design services, supported by a strong portfolio and global reach. The company maintains active engagement through social media and news updates, indicating a growth-oriented and client-focused approach. While no direct contact emails or phone numbers are publicly listed, a contact form is available, suggesting controlled communication channels. The lack of WHOIS data may indicate privacy protection or domain registration nuances but does not detract significantly from their market position. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly identified in the data.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could be a gap in security transparency. Privacy and cookie policies are not clearly presented, potentially impacting GDPR compliance. Overall, the security measures are adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Snøhetta

Description:

Snøhetta is a global transdisciplinary practice. Creating places for societies to connect with each other and with the world around them is a primary motivation in our work. Dialogue and diversity empower this approach.

Key Services:
ArchitectureLandscape ArchitectureInterior ArchitectureProduct DesignBrand & Experience
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML5Video embeddingLazy loading images
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

50/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

92/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

Strict DMARC Alignment

LOW

Strict alignment may cause legitimate emails to fail

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a:relay.appriver.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.createsend.com include:autotask.net include:customers.prezly.io include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.mailanyone.net include:squarespace-mail.com ip4:103.2.140.73 ip4:104.193.170.1 32 ip4:167.89.11.197 ip4:212.20.195.50 ip4:212.20.195.51 ip4:220.241.140.121 ip4:38.104.188.50 ip4:49.255.205.86 ip4:83.175.121.138 ip4:91.90.42.242 -all
DNS Lookups:8/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:iy64t4uzkl@rua.powerdmarc.com
Forensic Reports:iy64t4uzkl@ruf.powerdmarc.com
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
23 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(3073 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:143.198.241.193
Name Servers:
ns-01.garnesdata.no
ns-02.garnesdata.no
MX Records:
10: gw1.security.comendo.com
20: gw2.security.comendo.com
30: gw3.security.comendo.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071001, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:147ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a:relay.appriver.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.createsend.com include:autotask.net include:customers.prezly.io include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.mailanyone.net include:squarespace-mail.com ip4:103.2.140.73 ip4:104.193.170.1 32 ip4:167.89.11.197 ip4:212.20.195.50 ip4:212.20.195.51 ip4:220.241.140.121 ip4:38.104.188.50 ip4:49.255.205.86 ip4:83.175.121.138 ip4:91.90.42.242 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using modern web standards with HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, incorporating lazy loading for images and video content for performance optimization. It uses Craft CMS as the content management system, indicating a flexible and scalable backend. Hosting appears to leverage a CDN (b-cdn.net) for content delivery, enhancing speed and reliability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No outdated or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the technical implementation is strong with minor opportunities for security header enhancements.
Analyze Another Website